Born in Israel, I was raised to believe in the absolute primacy of Jewish life in Israel and in aliyah as the only legitimate choice for Jews living a life of exile outside it. It is only as a teenager that I encountered a somewhat different view of aliyah.
Having been sent to the United States by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on a program of “young ambassadors,” I had an opportunity to give a talk about life in Israel to a Jewish audience. At the end of the talk I was asked by a well-meaning young man, “What is the best thing we could do for Israel?”
Being an ardent young Zionist, I answered firmly: “Make aliyah.” A stunned silence ensued. After a few seconds, the young man chose to rephrase the question: “And what is the second best thing?”
Twenty years later, I no longer believe that for all Jews to live their whole lives in Israel is the best thing for Israel or for the Jewish people — and that includes those who already do live in Israel.
In a world where people are living better for longer and are blessed with instant and mobile communication, low-cost flights, and innovation- and information-driven jobs — a world to which the vast majority of Jews belong — it makes little sense to give ideological primacy to the idea that a person can only contribute to a community or a country by permanent and continuous residence throughout a lifetime in a single physical location.
Aliyah and its negatively judged counterpart, yeridah, assume a world of one-shot irrevocable decisions. This is not our world. Throughout a lifetime, more and more people change careers, jobs, interests, homes, locations and family configurations. There is no reason why any Jew in the world today, whether living in Israel or outside it, should be expected to make a final decision as to whether he or she wishes to live in Israel once and for all.
The idea governing the relations between Israel and the Jewish people should not be that every Jew should live in Israel, but rather that Israel should live in every Jew.
Israel should become the first or second home of every Jew. Home does not mean real estate; rather it means that one has a life-long meaningful relationship with the real Israel as it exists today. Israel should expand itself through time rather than space, acquiring real estate in the minds, souls and time of Jews worldwide.
What would this idea mean in practice? It would mean opening up and developing opportunities for Jews to come to Israel in their capacity as professionals, rather than as distant cousins amusing in their bar-mitzvah Hebrew.
It means that the emphasis shifts from asking Jews to contribute their funds to asking them to engage their talents. Israel and the Jewish people would benefit more by encouraging doctors, teachers, lawyers and artists to affiliate themselves with hospitals, schools, law firms and creative institutions in Israel.
Israeli schools could create programs designed to enable teachers wishing to come and teach to do so in their own language. Universities could offer more flexible programs and targeted modules that allow professors from abroad to make teaching and researching in Israel a part of their life.
The public service in Israel would benefit by adopting a proper internship program that would allow it to tap into the talents of college and university students from around the world. Promoting a host of technical measures — such as opening up the skies to low-cost flights, creating a flexible tax environment and offering a range of military-service programs — would also be in order. Perhaps a special immigration category along the lines of “Israel-affiliated Jews” could be created for those who want to work and live for long periods of time in Israel without registering as an immigrant.
The centralized and mostly wasteful aliyah efforts should be replaced by a voucher-based system of competitive provision of services. Jews who are still interested in making aliyah in its traditional form should receive a voucher that they could use to pay any one of the approved providers of “aliyah services.”
The aliyah service provider would be responsible for giving assistance in making the move, offering help in finding housing and employment and providing advice on how to navigate Israeli bureaucracy. Such a system would enable providers to specialize by country of origin, language, destination cities in Israel, age group, professions and even ideology.
The total budget currently dedicated to aliyah efforts by the Jewish Agency, the Government of Israel and other entities is estimated to be at least $200 million. That money yields approximately 20,000 immigrants, or about $10,000 per oleh.
So, each immigrant could receive slightly less — say, $7,500 — in the form of a voucher. That would still leave fiscal room for initiatives to increase the number of olim, or for funding programs that allow Jews to engage with Israel directly.
The call for a change in mindset is not a ploy to bring in aliyah through the back door. It is not about the next-best option, or about asking people for less — it’s because we can’t get more.
It is about a different evaluation of what would benefit Israel and the Jewish people as a whole. An end should be put to the idea of Shelilat Hagalut, the negation of Exile, as the idea inherent in the ideological primacy of aliyah.
A.B. Yehoshua has argued that to fully experience Jewish life, one must live in Israel. I agree that a full Jewish life is impossible without a meaningful relationship with Israel, but it is equally impossible to fully experience Jewish life only in Israel.
Jews who develop a meaningful relationship with Israel would benefit not only from an expansion of their world, but from an opportunity to engage with what is still the greatest Jewish undertaking of the past century. Israelis, too, would benefit immensely from greater exposure to Jewish life outside of Israel.
It is probably a good thing that half of the world’s Jewish people live in Israel at any given time — but it needn’t be the same half all the time.
Einat Wilf, a former foreign policy adviser to Shimon Peres, is the author of “My Israel, Our Generation” (BookSurge).
The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.
Copyright © 2013, Forward Association, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Cleveland Kidnapping, Elizabeth Smart and Us
Tracing the Jewish Origins of the Holy Ghost
Ethical Kosher Seal Stalls Amid Orthodox Opposition
Baby Boomers’ Rocky Road to Jewish Love
Rama Burshtein Offers Rare Glimpse of Orthodox World
You've successfully signed up!
Israel is, as Einat Wilf writes, "the greatest Jewish undertaking of the past century" - and much more. Her idea that Jews should have a meaningful relation with Israel, not necessarily as 'olim, is something that we all could agree with. It should only be! However, the reality of Diaspora Jewish life will not be changed through a proposed policy of offering professional positions on a temporary basis. Those same Jews who have never even traveled to Israel as tourists - although they have traveled to London, Paris and Rome - will also not take an interest in spending time teaching a university course, or manning the emergency room of an Israeli hospital. The problem has always been and it remains the continued weakening of Jewish identity, particularly in the American Diaspora. The only issue that must be addressed is the poor state of Jewish education. A Jewishly-literate Diaspora - a public that has studied Hebrew, the Jewish text, Jewish history and traditions - will naturally see Israel and her creativity as part of their world. However, for the Jewishly-illiterate, Israel is simply a foreign land - her culture is unintelligible and her problems are of no concern to them.
All this sounds nice but Einat Wilf seems as alienated from reality than her former boss Shimon Peres when he spoke about "a New Middle East". She says that we live in a new age of communications and travel. Well, some of us do, not most of us. And anyway, we still live in a world where the Nation-State is the rule. Israel needs citizens who pay taxes, produce, consume, serve in the army, and vote to ensure a Jewish majority. Einat Wilf has very nice ideas to bring Diaspora (mainly US) Jews closer to Israel and we should implement some of them, but the goal should still be Aliyah. Not only for Israel's sake, but for the Diaspora's sake who has no future as the Jewish identity is constantly weakened by ignorance and intermarriage.
aliya is based upon finding a job. Many olim fear that making aliya will not work due to difficulties in finding suitable employment. On this account, we at www.optimum-hr.co.il try to pay special attention to olim seeking hitech related positions in northen israel.