Eating Animals Are Wrong

Books

By Keith Meatto

Published October 28, 2009, issue of November 06, 2009.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Eating Animals
By Jonathan Safran Foer
Little, Brown and Company, 352 pages, $25.99.

PETER RIGAUDSHOTVIEW PHOTOGRAPHERS

As a novelist, Jonathan Safran Foer writes with a certain whimsy about violence. In “Everything Is Illuminated” and “Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close,” fictional treatments of the Holocaust and the aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks contain humor and lyricism to deflect the horror below the surface. Foer’s questions of life and death come from quirky narrators: a Ukrainian tour guide, a latchkey kid who speaks like a noir detective, even a “character” named Jonathan Safran Foer. Fiction frees Foer to swing at charged topics from a perch of safety.

In his new nonfiction book, “Eating Animals,” the gloves are off. Foer writes as Foer. The violence is not historical, but ongoing: the 10 billion land animals slaughtered each year in America for food. His central question is whether people should eat meat, given how it gets to our tables.

“Those alive today are the generations that came to know better,” he writes. “We are the ones of whom it will be fairly asked, What did you do when you learned the truth about eating animals?

To eat (or not to eat) beef or chicken or pork or fish is an act with consequences. Foer portrays an animal-industrial complex that sanctions horror and abuse to feed and stoke the demand for meat. Some 99% of meat in the United States comes from factory farms where animals live in squalor. The men and women who kill animals labor to feed the American diet, which is fast becoming the world’s diet. Meanwhile, the food industry staves off regulation, while its farms spread disease and degrade the environment. As Foer writes: “When we eat factory-farmed meat we live, literally, on tortured flesh. Increasingly, that tortured flesh is becoming our own.”

Foer layers his investigations with family history — from his grandmother who ate from garbage bins to survive World War II but refused to break kosher, to the moment in childhood when he linked chicken (the food) with chicken (the animal). After his son is born, the author’s doubts about his child’s diet lead him to travel the country to see how animals become meals. The more he learns, the more his disgust grows, until he swears off meat once and for all.

The images of de-beaked chickens, castrated pigs, bloodbaths and cesspools in “Eating Animals” would challenge most carnivores. Throughout, Foer balances memoir and reportage, the emotional and the empirical. At times, he makes reference to his dog to highlight the suffering of farm animals. Elsewhere, he disappears as a narrator and prints transcripts of interviews with farmers, activists and slaughterhouse workers. The technique highlights the issues at stake, in the spirit of Studs Terkel, who recorded working-class Americans in their own words. Yes, the author name checks Derrida and Kafka. But the straightforwardness and pastiche structure of “Eating Animals” — short chapters with pithy titles, a satirical glossary section and illustrations — is tailored to a general audience.

As a New Yorker who reports from the heartland, Foer is an outsider who observes insiders to document a national way of life. He wins the trust of his subjects, but at times, both sides are baffled. After Foer sees a pig slaughtered, he declines a farmer’s offer of fresh ham with the excuse that he is kosher. The reply is ironic; earlier in the book, he wonders if “kosher meat” has become a contradiction in terms.

The title refers to the act of eating animals and the fact that people are also the animals eating. While Foer distinguishes humans from the rest of the kingdom, he shows how other creatures suffer and feel pain. To ignore that truth is a delusion, he says, and language is a symptom of complicity. Foer dines out on the food industry’s use of euphemisms. Slaughter and butchery are known as “processing.” Husbandry is now “animal science.” And nearly all “cage-free” chickens have the same 67 square inches to roam as their compatriots behind bars, a space smaller than a sheet of paper. In this Orwellian lexicon, words mask horror and help people avoid responsibility for the death of animals.

As in Orwell’s works, taking responsibility means lifting linguistic masks. Foer says we also need to rethink the role of food in our lives and the codes that govern our appetites. For starters, we might refuse to eat turkey on Thanksgiving, a day that kills 45 million turkeys. The book’s November publication seems as deliberate as its spot in the Zeitgeist is certain. “Eating Animals” arrives at a time of obsession with food, from television cooking shows to Michael Pollan’s maxim: “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.”

Foer never connects the meat industry to the Holocaust or the September 11 attacks, the backdrops for his novels. Still, his work as a whole suggests a desire to make sense of mass violence aided by technology, as well as a fascination with legacy and lineage — how families and cultures and societies pass information from generation to generation. In his novels, characters look to their parents and grandparents for answers. Foer does the same in “Eating Animals” and then looks to the future through the eyes of his son.

This is not the first book to question the ethics of eating meat, and likely not the last. The author admits that an online search will yield videos of industry horrors in nanoseconds. Still, movements need spokesmen. As a writer with a platform and a willingness to address inconvenient truths about food, Foer seems to be campaigning for the job.

Keith Meatto is a writer in residence at the Kimmel Harding Nelson Center for the Arts in Nebraska. He lives in New York.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Could Spider-Man be Jewish? Andrew Garfield thinks so.
  • Most tasteless video ever? A new video shows Jesus Christ dying at Auschwitz.
  • "It’s the smell that hits me first — musty, almost sweet, emanating from the green felt that cradles each piece of silver cutlery in its own place." Only one week left to submit! Tell us the story of your family's Jewish heirloom.
  • Mazel tov to Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky!
  • If it's true, it's pretty terrifying news.
  • “My mom went to cook at the White House and all I got was this tiny piece of leftover raspberry ganache."
  • Planning on catching "Fading Gigolo" this weekend? Read our review.
  • A new initiative will spend $300 million a year towards strengthening Israel's relationship with the Diaspora. http://jd.fo/q3Iaj Is this money spent wisely?
  • Lusia Horowitz left pre-state Israel to fight fascism in Spain — and wound up being captured by the Nazis and sent to die at Auschwitz. Share her remarkable story — told in her letters.
  • Vered Guttman doesn't usually get nervous about cooking for 20 people, even for Passover. But last night was a bit different. She was cooking for the Obamas at the White House Seder.
  • A grumpy Jewish grandfather is wary of his granddaughter's celebrating Easter with the in-laws. But the Seesaw says it might just make her appreciate Judaism more. What do you think?
  • “Twist and Shout.” “Under the Boardwalk.” “Brown-Eyed Girl.” What do these great songs have in common? A forgotten Jewish songwriter. We tracked him down.
  • What can we learn from tragedies like the rampage in suburban Kansas City? For one thing, we must keep our eyes on the real threats that we as Jews face.
  • When is a legume not necessarily a legume? Philologos has the answer.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.