Keeping It in the Family

Fiction

By Dan Friedman

Published December 24, 2007, issue of December 28, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Who by Fire, Who by Blood

By Jon Papernick
Exile Editions, 346 pages, $26.95.

The Jewish season of repentance is intended to broaden feelings of guilt — from daily activities to a smorgasbord of global and personal actions over the year that has passed. The world is not independent of us; we make it what it is. From a title inspired by a Rosh Hashanah prayer to its morally disturbing ending, “Who by Fire, Who by Blood” is a thriller explicitly set in that season — and it is intent on judgment.

The Kafka-esque world of Jon Papernick’s well-received 2002 collection, “The Ascent of Eli Israel and Other Stories,” has been replaced in this book by a frighteningly realistic world in which the protagonist faces judgments both internal and external at every turn.

The novel is a thriller that plays with the various political and personal identifications of Israeli and Jewish Americans. After the death of his father, Matthew Ze’ev Stone has to reconcile his slight achievements with the grander lives lived by his ancestors. Papa Julius, his father’s father, was a hitman for Murder Inc., one so successful that he was able to retire to Florida rich and under his own name. Matthew’s father, a record-breakingly young district attorney, seems to have little in common with Papa Julius except substantial achievement and aggressive Zionism — including a devoted regard for Ze’ev Jabotinsky. Matthew is left in tenuous but sole possession of a vital piece of information from his father’s will that allows him access to a key bank account. With each approaching character more self-interested, unsavory or ignorant than the last, Matthew has nowhere to turn and is trapped into guessing and second-guessing what his father wanted him to do with that information and into deciding how his actions will affect the family’s reputation.

The last half-century has been marked by an increase in terrorism related to the conflict between the realpolitik of nation-states and the self-interest of smaller ethnic, religious or ideological groups. One of this novel’s great strengths is that the arguments made by the characters on either side are utterly convincing. Larry Zohar provides the weary voice of a liberal status quo defending a certain amount of inevitable injustice; Zalman Seligman and the Rev. Randall Roebling Nation lead us through the warped logics that begin with feelings of victimhood and end with acts of terrorism.

Although it is an unfashionable division to note, there is a clear distinction between Papernick’s handling of plot on the one hand and character on the other. While the plot and its Brooklyn context are skillfully evoked and drive the story to the inexorable but un-guessable ending, the deftly sketched characters of Papernick’s short stories have not yet translated into complex novelistic portraits. Characters in the novel are too often stereotypes — the absent mother, the dead father, the concerned law officer, the fanatical priest; or, they are ciphers of real people — Edward Said, Meir Kahane and an Al Sharpton/Louis Farrakhan/Jesse Jackson composite. Even Gabby Grunhut, Matthew’s father’s best friend’s daughter and Matthew’s eventual girlfriend, keeps promising to be a more interesting character than she turns out to be.

All these surrounding characterizations would be easily excusable if they were arguably a product of Matthew’s own slightly deranged mind, but there seems little argument that this is, in fact, the case. Although Matthew has undergone a psychological breakdown and subsequently the traumatic loss of his father to cancer, the narrative voice seems sane and quite separate from his fractured consciousness. Matthew’s decisions seem contingent and ill considered, but the manner of their taking is portrayed in a calm and reasonable tone.

Personal, historical and religious judgments are played out across one another, ending up hopelessly entangled as this thriller unfolds. As with all good thrillers, “Who by Fire, Who by Blood” works by keeping you guessing and turning the pages. Here we are kept wondering through whom, how and when we will learn the ramifications of becoming a ruthless ideologue and what the cost of not becoming one might be. “Who by Fire, Who by Blood” is a book about judgments and the misreading of history, starting with a misunderstanding of one’s parents. Even the U’Netaneh Tokef is deliberately misquoted. There is no blood in it, though it does end “who will be degraded and who will be exalted.” But to answer that, you’ll have to read and see.

Dan Friedman is associate editor of Zeek: A Jewish Journal of Thought and Culture.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • British Jews are having their 'Open Hillel' moment. Do you think Israel advocacy on campus runs the risk of excluding some Jewish students?
  • "What I didn’t realize before my trip was that I would leave Uganda with a powerful mandate on my shoulders — almost as if I had personally left Egypt."
  • Is it better to have a young, fresh rabbi, or a rabbi who stays with the same congregation for a long time? What do you think?
  • Why does the leader of Israel's social protest movement now work in a beauty parlor instead of the Knesset?
  • What's it like to be Chagall's granddaughter?
  • Is pot kosher for Passover. The rabbis say no, especially for Ashkenazi Jews. And it doesn't matter if its the unofficial Pot Day of April 20.
  • A Ukrainian rabbi says he thinks the leaflets ordering Jews in restive Donetsk to 'register' were a hoax. But the disturbing story still won't die.
  • Some snacks to help you get through the second half of Passover.
  • You wouldn't think that a Soviet-Jewish immigrant would find much in common with Gabriel Garcia Marquez. But the famed novelist once helped one man find his first love. http://jd.fo/f3JiS
  • Can you relate?
  • The Forverts' "Bintel Brief" advice column ran for more than 65 years. Now it's getting a second life — as a cartoon.
  • Half of this Hillel's members believe Jesus was the Messiah.
  • Vinyl isn't just for hipsters and hippies. Israeli photographer Eilan Paz documents the most astonishing record collections from around the world:http://jd.fo/g3IyM
  • Could Spider-Man be Jewish? Andrew Garfield thinks so.
  • Most tasteless video ever? A new video shows Jesus Christ dying at Auschwitz.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.