Still Struggling for the Right To Choose

Opinion

By Phyllis Snyder

Published January 16, 2008, issue of January 18, 2008.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Next week marks the 35th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision. In the ongoing struggle to keep abortion safe and legal in the United States, there is no rest for the weary.

It was only a generation ago when as many as 10,000 women died each year from illegal abortions. Many thousands more suffered permanent injury, and countless others were forced to bear children against their will.

Not only did Roe affirm women’s constitutional right to control their bodies, but it underscored that women are entitled to freedom of conscience to act in accordance with their own religious and moral beliefs, rather than a state-imposed doctrine. Those 35 years have been marked by legal and legislative setbacks and open hostility from three presidents, but Roe has survived. Despite the ideological onslaught against it, a majority of Americans still favor the substance of the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision.

Next week also marks the beginning of the new session of Congress, providing an appropriate moment to take stock and set new priorities that will build on this important constitutional milestone and reverse some of the setbacks Roe has suffered along the way.

First and foremost, the Senate must refrain from confirming any more judges hand-picked by the Bush administration for their anti-abortion views and far right-wing credentials. Far too many of these jurists are now sitting in lifetime seats on the federal bench, including the Supreme Court, confirmed by a Senate that gave the executive branch free sway to impose its ideology on the federal bench. Not only do these nominees pose a threat to a woman’s constitutional right to decide whether and when to have children, but the Supreme Court has already reversed earlier court decisions protecting a woman’s right to choose.

Second, we need safeguards when it comes to a woman’s ability to exercise her right to make decisions about her reproductive health. Young women and men deserve comprehensive, fact-based sexuality education free of ideological bias and pseudoscience. Women of childbearing age deserve access to safe, effective and affordable birth control. And these same women must have access to abortion services that respect their autonomy as moral decision-makers, regardless of income or place of residence.

There are several strong, proactive bills pending in Congress that would go a long way toward putting up those safeguards. They include the Prevention First Act, which would increase funding for Title X, the federal government’s leading program providing family planning to low-income and poor women; the Responsible Education About Life Act, which would create the first dedicated federal funding for medically accurate, comprehensive sexuality education; and the Freedom of Choice Act, which would codify the 1973 Roe decision, barring states or the federal government from interfering with a woman’s right to choose to decide whether and when to have children.

We must make clear to our representatives in Washington that these bills are of the highest importance. But that is not all. We must also impress upon Congress the need to undo a number of egregious laws and policies.

Congress should repeal the Hyde amendment, which since 1976 has prevented federal funds from paying for abortions, as well as the so-called Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, which outlaws particular abortion procedures without regard to the threat to a woman’s health. Congress should also restore the ability of drug companies to supply discounted birth control pills to colleges and some low-income community health centers, as they had been able to do for nearly 20 years until the practice was inadvertently banned in the 2005 Deficit Reduction Act. And Congress should do away with the “global gag rule” barring nongovernmental organizations abroad that receive federal funds from performing abortions or even talking about abortion as an option.

There is truly no rest for the weary when it comes to the right of women to determine their own destiny regarding reproductive rights. After 35 years, the rights protected by the Roe decision hang by a thread.

Today, a woman’s ability to exercise her rights under Roe depends on how much money she has and where she lives. Those who value this constitutional right must champion an agenda that works to achieve universal access to reproductive health and protects the basic right to reproductive choices.

Phyllis Snyder is president of the National Council of Jewish Women.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • The rose petals have settled, and Andi has made her (Jewish?) choice. We look back on the #Bachelorette finale:
  • "Despite the great pain and sadness surrounding a captured soldier, this should not shape the face of this particular conflict – not in making concessions and not in negotiations, not in sobering assessments of this operation’s achievements or the need to either retreat or move forward." Do you agree?
  • Why genocide is always wrong, period. And the fact that some are talking about it shows just how much damage the war in Gaza has already done.
  • Construction workers found a 75-year-old deli sign behind a closing Harlem bodega earlier this month. Should it be preserved?
  • "The painful irony in Israel’s current dilemma is that it has been here before." Read J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis of the conflict:
  • Law professor Dan Markel waited a shocking 19 minutes for an ambulance as he lay dying after being ambushed in his driveway. Read the stunning 911 transcript as neighbor pleaded for help.
  • Happy birthday to the Boy Who Lived! July 31 marks the day that Harry Potter — and his creator, J.K. Rowling — first entered the world. Harry is a loyal Gryffindorian, a matchless wizard, a native Parseltongue speaker, and…a Jew?
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels. http://jd.fo/g4cjH
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.