Shabbat by Way of Babylon

On Language

A Feast Day in Babylon?: D.W. Griffith’s
1916 film, ‘Intolerance,’ shows decadence
under siege.
Photofest
A Feast Day in Babylon?: D.W. Griffith’s 1916 film, ‘Intolerance,’ shows decadence under siege.

By Philologos

Published June 01, 2011, issue of June 10, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The holiday of Shavuot has arrived — and with it, a d’var Torah, a commentary on a biblical passage, customarily delivered by a rabbi or member of a congregation, from Edward Reingold of Michiana, Mich. For his subject, Mr. Reingold has chosen the verses in Leviticus 23 that tell us when Shavuot is to be celebrated — that is, seven weeks plus a day, or 50 days, from the commencement of the Omer, the “sheaf-offering” of the barley harvest that begins during the week of Passover. (This is why the holiday is called ḥag ha-shavu’ot, “the feast of weeks,” in Hebrew, and Pentecost, from Greek pentekoste, “fiftieth,” in English.) Leviticus 23:10-11 reads, in the Jewish Publication Society translation: “When you enter the land that I am giving you and you reap its [barley] harvest, you shall bring the first sheaf of your harvest to the priest. He shall elevate the sheaf before the Lord for acceptance in your behalf; the priest shall elevate it on the day after the Sabbath.”

“The day after the Sabbath” is a straightforward translation of biblical Hebrew’s mi-moḥarat ha-shabbat — and yet, as Mr. Reingold observes in his d’var Torah, the meaning of these words is anything but straightforward. Within the context of the week of Passover, what “Sabbath” is the Bible talking about? And how, unless we know, can we start counting the 50 days that determine the date of Shavuot?

This question, Mr. Reingold goes on to elucidate, was already asked in antiquity, with different answers being given. The one proposed by the Pharisees, the early rabbis, was that the word shabbat in this verse does not refer to the seventh day of the week or Saturday, as it usually does in Hebrew, but simply means “day of rest” or “feast day” and designates the first day of Passover. Since this day, according to the Bible, falls on the 15th of the month of Nisan, the Omer begins to be counted on the 16th of Nisan, and therefore Shavuot falls on the 6th of Sivan, which is indeed when Jews traditionally celebrate it.

The Sadducees, the main rivals of the Pharisees in Second Temple times, disagreed. The word shabbat in Leviticus 23:11, they held, did mean the seventh day of the week and referred to the Saturday of the week of Passover, regardless of where in that week it occurred in a given year. Since this could be anywhere between the 15th and 21st of Nisan, Shavuot, too, had no fixed date and could fall between the 6th and 12th of Sivan. Subsequently, the Karaites, the heterodox sect that broke with rabbinic Judaism and insisted on a literal interpretation of the Bible, adopted this view in the Middle Ages. Other nonrabbinic Jews, such as the Falashas of Ethiopia, while concurring with the rabbinic understanding of shabbat in Leviticus 23:11 as a generic “day of rest,” took the word to refer to the seventh day of Passover rather than to the first, and therefore celebrated Shavuot on the 13th of Sivan.

Mr. Reingold’s d’var Torah surveys these different readings of the verse in Leviticus and goes on to discuss a more modern one proposed by the American Jewish orientalist Morris Jastrow in an article published in 1911. Jastrow’s suggestion was based on an excavated Babylonian cuneiform tablet containing a vocabulary of calendar terms in Akkadian, an ancient Semitic language related to Hebrew, in which the word sabbatu or sappatu designated the 15th day of each lunar month, when the moon was full. An Akkadian synonym for this day was um nuḥ libi — literally, “the day of the heart’s rest” (in biblical Hebrew, this would be yom nu’aḥ ha-lev), and late 19th-century scholars before Jastrow had pounced on this as proof that the weekly Hebrew shabbat had its historical and linguistic antecedents in the monthly Babylonian sabbatu.

Jastrow himself discussed such a possibility at length in a chapter of his 1914 book, “Hebrew and Babylonian Traditions.” In the article cited by Mr. Reingold, however, his goal was limited to arguing that the shabbat of Leviticus 23:11 originally meant neither “Saturday” nor “feast day,” but rather, as in Akkadian, “day of the full moon.” Since the moon is full on the 15th of Nisan, which is the first day of Passover, Jastrow was effectively vindicating the rabbinic dating of Shavu’ot, though basing it on a different linguistic understanding.

“Jastrow’s conjecture is by no means generally accepted by scholars,” Mr. Reingold’s d’var Torah concludes, “but it is ingenious.” That it is — and the case for it does not strike me as being any weaker a century later. There are problems with it, most of all that nowhere else in the Bible does shabbat explicitly mean “day of the full moon,” but there are problems with all other interpretations of Leviticus 23:11, too. I thank Mr. Reingold for having brought this one to our attention, and I wish him and all of you a happy Feast of Weeks.

Questions for Philologos can be sent to philologos@forward.com


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • The Jewish bachelorette has spoken.
  • "When it comes to Brenda Turtle, I ask you: What do you expect of a woman repressed all her life who suddenly finds herself free to explore? We can sit and pass judgment, especially when many of us just simply “got over” own sexual repression. But we are obliged to at least acknowledge that this problem is very, very real, and that complete gender segregation breeds sexual repression and unhealthy attitudes toward female sexuality."
  • "Everybody is proud of the resistance. No matter how many people, including myself, disapprove of or even hate Hamas and its ideology, every single person in Gaza is proud of the resistance." Part 2 of Walid Abuzaid's on-the-ground account of life in #Gaza:
  • After years in storage, Toronto’s iconic red-and-white "Sam the Record Man" sign, complete with spinning discs, will return to public view near its original downtown perch. The sign came to symbolize one of Canada’s most storied and successful Jewish family businesses.
  • Is $4,000 too much to ask for a non-member to be buried in a synagogue cemetery?
  • "Let’s not fall into the simplistic us/them dichotomy of 'we were just minding our business when they started firing rockets at us.' We were not just minding our business. We were building settlements, manning checkpoints, and filling jails." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: 10,000 Israel supporters gathered for a solidarity rally near the United Nations in New York yesterday.
  • Step into the Iron Dome with Tuvia Tenenbom.
  • What do you think of Wonder Woman's new look?
  • "She said that Ruven Barkan, a Conservative rabbi, came into her classroom, closed the door and turned out the lights. He asked the class of fourth graders to lie on the floor and relax their bodies. Then, he asked them to pray for abused children." Read Paul Berger's compelling story about a #Savannah community in turmoil:
  • “Everything around me turns orange, then a second of silence, then a bomb goes off!" First installment of Walid Abuzaid’s account of the war in #Gaza:
  • Is boredom un-Jewish?
  • Let's face it: there's really only one Katz's Delicatessen.
  • "Dear Diaspora Jews, I’m sorry to break it to you, but you can’t have it both ways. You can’t insist that every Jew is intrinsically part of the Israeli state and that Jews are also intrinsically separate from, and therefore not responsible for, the actions of the Israeli state." Do you agree?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.