For Israel and Turkey, Breaking Up Is Easy To Do

Security Ties Never Translated Into Broader Alliance

By Yigal Schleifer

Published September 16, 2011, issue of September 23, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

When Israel and Turkey first forged their now shattered alliance in the late 1990s, there was much to bring together the two countries. The odd men out in the Middle East, both were non-Arab military powers who had either strained or outright hostile relations with their neighbors, a domestic terrorism problem and a strategic vision that looked westward, particularly toward Washington. It was a marriage that its architects, particularly in Israel, believed was going to last.

It turns out, breaking up is actually easy to do.

With the almost complete deterioration in Turkey-Israel relations following last year’s tragic Gaza flotilla incident in which Israeli commandos killed nine Turkish activists, it’s clear that the alliance was built on a less-than-solid foundation.

Despite the closeness the two countries once enjoyed, the relationship between Turkey and Israel was never balanced, skewing heavily toward military and security relations and a sense of shared threat in a hostile region.

Turkey’s efforts over the past few years to alter the relationship, particularly by de-emphasizing its security and strategic components, and to reintegrate itself into the Middle East — and Israel’s failure to properly read those moves and other political and social changes in Turkey — has now left relations between the two countries woefully out of balance once again. For Israel, which now must rebuild its ties with Turkey from the ground up, this imbalance and a continuing misreading of its causes will likely only lead to more problems down the road.

As the United Nations Palmer Report on the flotilla (a document that Ankara has strongly repudiated) makes clear, neither side is blameless in the chain of events that brought relations between Ankara and Jerusalem to — and then past — the breaking point. But a succession of Israeli leaders, particularly the current government, can certainly be faulted for continuously failing to grasp the changes, from the diminishing power of the military to the growing importance of public opinion, that took place in Turkey over the past decade, as well as the growing resonance there of the unresolved Palestinian issue. While it might not have prevented the deterioration in Turkish-Israeli relations, a better read on Turkey would have at least kept them from flaming out so spectacularly.

Israeli politicians like to portray Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) as “Islamist” and bent on breaking the relations with the Jewish state in order to assert a position of leadership in the Middle East. But the truth is that the AKP and its leader, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, came into office seeking not to shatter the alliance with Israel, but rather to make sure it didn’t jeopardize relations with other countries in the region.

More significantly, Israeli leaders failed to appreciate how much the new leadership in Turkey viewed the relationship with Israel as part and parcel of the anti-democratic political system instituted by the secularist military and the old guard Kemalist elite – which essentially ruled the country since its founding in 1923. Israel failed to realize how successful the AKP was in curtailing the political power of the military and, along with it, the primacy of military relations. For Israeli analysts, the power of the military meant that the relations would never falter. But this false certainty only contributed to the growing divide between Ankara and Jerusalem.

Many Israeli politicians further failed to grasp the resonance of the unresolved Palestinian issue among the Turkish public and in Turkish politics, where it serves as common ground across the political spectrum, from leftists to Islamists. It’s worth recalling that the previous downgrade in Turkish-Israeli relations came in 1980, after Israel annexed East Jerusalem, or that in 2002, leftist Turkish Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit referred to Israeli operations in the West Bank’s Jenin as “genocide.” With the rise of the Islamic-rooted AKP and the decline of the Turkish military’s influence, Israel’s conflict with the Palestinians has become an even more potent domestic political issue in Turkey.

But at the heart of this definitive breakdown of Turkish-Israeli relations — and what makes any rapprochement between the two countries unlikely for now — lies what has been an increasingly divergent view of the Middle East and each country’s role in the region.

Turkey no longer sees itself as an outsider and has been working toward deepening its political and economic ties in the Middle East. Furthermore, Ankara believes that Israel’s continuing occupation of the Palestinians stands as the main roadblock toward the emergence of a more harmonious regional order that Ankara would like to see (one that, it must be said, envisions Turkey as a political and economic leader).

Israel, meanwhile, has only become more of an outsider in recent years, governed by a coalition that appears to be ideologically opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state and unable to manage the new realities of the Middle East.

At the height of the alliance, Turkey believed that the strategic advantages of its engagement with Israel outweighed its political costs, both regional and domestic. But this calculation has changed. Ankara now appears to believe that an open confrontation with Israel provides both strategic and political advantages.

Restoring balance to the Turkey-Israel relationship will require mature diplomacy, a more nuanced understanding of each other by both countries and, without a doubt, positive moves by Jerusalem on the Palestinian front. In the meantime, replacing one imbalanced relationship with another does not serve Israel, Turkey or the Middle East at a time when the region certainly doesn’t need yet another conflict.

Yigal Schleifer is a Washington-based journalist and analyst covering Turkey. He is also the author of Istanbul Calling (, a blog about Turkish foreign and domestic affairs.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here:
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • "Mark your calendars: It was on Sunday, July 20, that the momentum turned against Israel." J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis on Israel's ground operation in Gaza:
  • What do you think?
  • "To everyone who is reading this article and saying, “Yes, but… Hamas,” I would ask you to just stop with the “buts.” Take a single moment and allow yourself to feel this tremendous loss. Lay down your arms and grieve for the children of Gaza."
  • Professor Dan Markel, 41 years old, was found shot and killed in his Tallahassee home on Friday. Jay Michaelson can't explain the death, just grieve for it.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.