How Yahweh Got Its Verbal Vibe Back

Ancient Hypothetical Word for God Gains New Popularity

Bono Knows: Superstar Bono gave the word ‘Yahweh’ a new lease on life when he mentioned it in a 2004 hit.
getty images
Bono Knows: Superstar Bono gave the word ‘Yahweh’ a new lease on life when he mentioned it in a 2004 hit.

By Philologos

Published November 06, 2011, issue of November 11, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Among the blog posts that turn up in my email box are some written for Commentary magazine’s Contentions blog by Peter Wehner, who was a speechwriter for president George W. Bush. Wehner’s pieces, politically conservative and tempered by a Christian outlook, are always thoughtful, and I was struck by a sentence in a recent one that criticized politicians who identify their ambitions with divine callings. “Even though,” Wehner wrote, “Yahweh can work in mysterious ways… my view has long been that one has to have a fairly deep spiritual life… before one is equipped to discern the voice of the Lord on, say, career choices.”

I couldn’t agree more, but Yahweh? Unless used sarcastically, this is not a word for God that one would normally expect to see in the buttoned-down discourse of an ex-White House speechwriter — and Wehner wasn’t being sarcastic. What’s up?

“Yahweh” is the hypothetical but widely accepted scholarly version of how God’s sacred biblical name, spelled with the Hebrew letters yud, heh, vav and heh, was pronounced by Jews before a Second Temple-period ban on uttering it aloud caused its ancient sound to be forgotten. When the Bible is chanted in synagogues, these four consonants, which are unaccompanied in the Torah scroll by vowel marks, are read as adonai, “Lord”; yet already in the Middle Ages, Christian Hebraists theorized, based on the vowels of adonai, that the biblical God’s original name was Yehovah, or (since a capital “Y” was sometimes written as “J” in Latin) Jehovah. For hundreds of years, this was its conventional form in European languages, even though European Bibles followed the Jewish practice of substituting “Lord” for it. The King James translation, for example, uses “Jehovah” in only seven of more than 6,000 occurrences of yud-heh-vav-heh in the Bible, the first time being in the Book of Exodus, where God is made to say, “And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob by the name of God Almighty [Hebrew el-shaddai], but by my name Jehovah I was not known to them.”

It was only in the 19th century that modern biblical scholars put forth the counter-theory that the original pronunciation of yud-heh-vav-heh must have been “Yahweh,” pointing to such things as the ancient Hebrew vav’s probable articulation as “w” and a tradition possessed by the Samaritans — whose community has continued to read the Torah in Hebrew ever since it broke with Judaism 2,500 years ago — of pronouncing the word as “Yah-beh.”

Yet while most biblical scholars have tended to go along with this, “Yahweh” never, until recently, gained any of the currency outside the scholarly world that “Jehovah” once had. The only place where it was found, apart from scholarly books and articles, tended to be in anti-Jewish and anti-Old Testament diatribes, where — perhaps because to some ears, its two syllables suggested an aborigine war cry — it connoted not just the ancient God of the Hebrews, but also a primitive, vengeful and barbaric God who was all that the Christian God of love, or the atheist’s no God at all, was not.

Peter Wehner, however, is a Christian who, like many Christians in America today, has great sympathy for the Jews and a strong awareness of Christianity’s Jewish roots. When someone like him uses “Yahweh” as a simple synonym for “God,” we know that something has happened to the word.

Indeed, part of what has happened is American Christian philo-Semitism itself. Never before in history have so many Christians had such a positive attitude toward Judaism, and this also means a positive attitude toward the God of Judaism. Never mind that, for Jews, “Yahweh” strikes no chord of recognition. For some Christians — Wehner apparently being one — its adoption represents a rapprochement with Judaism and recognition that the Christian and the Jewish God are the same.

Paradoxically, however, another part of what has happened is Christianity’s perceived liberation, as it were, from one of Judaism’s last fetters. Already with the publication of the American Standard Version of the Bible in 1885, in which, for the first time in the history of Bible translation, “Jehovah” was used regularly for yud-heh-vav-heh, the translators’ introduction stated that “a Jewish superstition, which regarded the Divine Name as too sacred to be uttered, ought no longer to dominate in the English or any other version of the Old Testament.” In 1995, taking this one step further, a revised ASV, now called the World English Bible, began to appear with — once again, a historical first — “Yahweh” in place of “Jehovah.” In this case, the trend of returning to the “authentic” God of the Bible means returning to a God who is pre-Jewish.

Finally, there is the fact that the “primitive” itself has undergone a re-evaluation in our age and is often thought of as the most genuine part of us. When a popular rock group like U2, in a 2004 release, sings “Yahweh, Yahweh / Always pain before a child is born / Yahweh, Yahweh / Still I’m waiting for the dawn,” it’s precisely the invocation of the primitive — of the religious longing of our core humanity — that is being deliberately brought into play. This, too, has contributed to the sea change that has befallen “Yahweh,” a very old word — if, that is, it ever existed — with some very new vibes.

Questions for Philologos can be sent to philologos@forward.com


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.