Democrats Slam GOP Over 'Zero' Israel Aid

With Jewish Support in Mind, Heavyweights Pounce on Issue

By Nathan Guttman

Published November 14, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Democratic heavyweights hit back at Republicans over their debate discussion about “zero-ing” U.S. aid to foreign countries, including Israel, during the weekend CBS News Republican debate.

Smelling a chance to win back disaffected Jewish voters, former Congressman Mel Levine penned an article in Israel’s Haaretz daily blasting the idea, and Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz issued a statement calling the proposal to begin aid discussions at zero “irresponsible.”

Former congressman Robert Wexler, who is known as both a supporter of Israel and of President Obama, convened a press conference call Monday in which he called the position of some of the Republican candidates “troubling” and argued that in calling for zeroing out foreign aid they are not honoring a memorandum of understanding signed between the U.S. and Israel in 2007.

The “zero” policy, he added, “sends a message to Iran that Israel’s outstanding military capabilities might suffer in years to come.”

The tempest started on Saturday night during the latest GOP debate. Republicans attacked President Barack Obama over Iran.

But alarm bells began ringing among pro-Israel activists when the discussion turned to the future of U.S. foreign aid. Asked if his policy of “foreign aid starts at zero” would include also aid to Israel, Texas governor Rick Perry replied: “Absolutely, every country would start at zero.” Perry immediately added that “obviously, Israel is a special ally, and my bet is that we would be funding them at some substantial level.”

Mitt Romney, the leading Republican candidate and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich also supported a “start at zero” policy for foreign aid.

After facing a barrage of attacks from Democrats stressing the potential threat this policy presents to Israel, Romney’s spokesman issued a statement making clear the former governor “was only referring to Pakistan and does not support zeroing out funding for every country.”

For Democrats, this clarification made little difference. The party sent out its heavyweight Jewish surrogates to speak out against cutting foreign aid.

The foreign aid debate couldn’t come at a better time for Democrats. It helps them change the subject with Jewish voters, who were still smarting from President Obama’s open microphone incident in which he was overheard complaining about the difficulty in dealing with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The biggest stakeholder in the debate over funding foreign aid has so far remained silent. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the main pro-Israel lobby which dedicates a significant part of its work to securing aid to Israel, has yet to make its voice heard on the issues raised in the Republican debate.

AIPAC has stressed many times the need to ensure U.S. foreign aid to all countries and highlighted the benefits of such aid in advancing U.S. interests around the world. However, it refrained from publically taking on Republican candidates speaking out against foreign aid, presumably in an attempt to avoid being seen as supporting either side in the political debate.

Wexler, for one, believes AIPAC and like-minded organizations should speak out. “Certainly, the pro-Israel advocates in the U.S. should express themselves in the strongest of terms and reject this idea,” the former Democratic congressman said in his conference call.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.