Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Breaking News

Romney and Santorum Would Vote for Ron Paul

Two Republican presidential candidates said they would vote for Rep. Ron Paul if he wins the GOP nomination.

Mitt Romney, considered a frontrunner, and Rick Santorum, now undergoing a late surge in polls in Iowa, both told CNN in recent days that they would vote for Paul if he were to secure the nomination.

“I don’t agree with a lot of things that Ron Paul says, and I would vehemently oppose many of his initiatives, and I believe that we’d be able to move him in a direction that’s more productive,” Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, told CNN Wednesday.

Santorum, a former senator from Pennsylvania said he would absolutely vote for Paul, but added: “I’d have to take a lot of antacids when I go into the voting booth and vote for him.”

Paul, a Texas congressman, is currently placing second in many polls in Iowa, home to the nation’s first caucuses, and in New Hampshire, the first state to hold primaries.

Paul’s foreign policy views – including his support for ending aid to Israel and emphatic warnings against confronting Iran over its suspected nuclear weapons program – have made him an outlier in the Republican field. He has been strongly criticized by many of his fellow candidates.

In addition, Paul has been dogged by questions about anti-Semitic, anti-gay and racist content in newsletters sent out under his name in the 1980s and 1990s.

Romney and Santorum expressed hope that if Paul were nominated, he could be persuaded to change his positions.

Fellow candidate Newt Gingrich told CNN Tuesday that he could not vote for Paul, citing his views on Israel and Iran, as well as the newsletters. But in the same interview, the former U.S. House of Representatives speaker later said that it would be “a very hard choice” if he had to choose between President Obama and Paul.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we need 500 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Our Goal: 500 gifts during our Passover Pledge Drive!

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.