Pleasant, Pleasanter and Pleasanter-er

Why Can't It Just Be a Whole Lot More Pleasant?

Dumb and Dumber-er: Philologos hunts for what determines the usage of the comparative form of adjectives.
new line cinema
Dumb and Dumber-er: Philologos hunts for what determines the usage of the comparative form of adjectives.

By Philologos

Published May 22, 2012, issue of May 25, 2012.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Rabbi Richard Hammerman of Caldwell, N.J., writes about my column of May 4, in which I said it was “pleasanter” to contemplate the origins of the expression “finger-lickin’ good” than it was to contemplate an Iranian nuclear bomb:

“I always enjoy your columns and learn something new and often useful from them. But ‘pleasanter,’ not ‘more pleasant than’? Perhaps you were caught up in the slangy context of the article.”

Was it wrong of me to say “pleasanter”? Rabbi Hammerman’s question got me thinking about an issue I had never thought about before. Is there any rule that tells us when the comparative form of an adjective is made by adding “-er” and when by being preceded by “more”? If there is, I’ve never come across it in any book of English grammar or usage. And yet every language has many rules that aren’t conspicuous enough for the grammar books to mention or for native speakers even to be aware of. A high percentage of the sentences we utter are partly formed by such unconscious rules, in the absence of which we would be forced to make constant decisions that would slow down our speech considerably. What, then, is the rule governing “pleasanter” verses “more pleasant”?

In an attempt to find it, I began by making an associational list of comparative adjectives. Quicker. Slower. More methodical. More patient. More willing. Readier. Sooner. Later. Darker. Brighter. Sunnier. Cloudier. Sadder. More depressed. More melancholy. More cheerful. Happier. Funnier. Gladder. More content. Wiser. Smarter. Shrewder. More cunning. Craftier. More skillful. More experienced, etc., etc.

Did a rule suggest itself from these examples? Indeed, it did. It went: Comparative adjectives are formed with -er from all one-syllable words, such as “quick,” “slow,” “soon” and “late,” or from words of two syllables ending in “y,” such as “sunny,” “cloudy,” “happy” and “merry.” In all other cases, they are formed by putting “more” in front of them. Such a rule explains why we don’t say “He’s more quick than I am,” “That joke is more funny,” “She’s become depresseder over the years” or “That’s the methodicaler approach.” We automatically avoid such usages without having to think about them.

Since “pleasant” isn’t a one-syllable word, or a two-syllable word ending in “y,” Rabbi Hammerman would appear to be right: I should have said “more pleasant” rather than “pleasanter.” But why, then, do I rebel against this conclusion and still feel that “pleasanter,” while not excluding the possibility of “more pleasant,” is perfectly good English? Can it be that the rule I have formulated is inexact? Are there more-than-one-syllable adjectives not ending in “y” that take “-er,” too?

Actually, there are. Looking for such cases, I thought of a dozen or more. Although it wouldn’t be wrong to say, “There’s a more simple solution to that problem,” one would more probably say, “There’s a simpler solution,” even though “simple,” like “pleasant,” is a two-syllable word not ending in “y.” Similarly, “We live on a quieter street than they do” feels more natural than, “We live on a more quiet street than they do.” And while I couldn’t think of a single three-or-more-syllable adjective that can take “-er,” there are some two-syllable ones that seem able to take “-er” and “more” equally well. “You’re handsomer than he is” and “You’re more handsome than he is” both sound about as good to me; so do “stupider” and “more stupid,” “cleverer” and “more clever,” “subtler” and “more subtle,” “humbler” and “more humble,” “gentler” and “more gentle,” “nimbler” and “more nimble,” “mellower” and “more mellow,” “shallower” and “more shallow,” “hollower” and “more hollow,” and still others. To my ear, “pleasant” is one of these.

But what’s the rule that tells us which two-syllable adjectives not ending in “y” can take “-er” and which can’t? As hard as I tried, I couldn’t come up with one. It’s true that certain sound patterns seem more likely to produce such words. “Simple,” “humble,” “subtle,” and “gentle” all have the same ending, as do “mellow,” “shallow” and “hollow” — but “quiet,” “handsome,” “stupid,” “clever” and “pleasant” do not. If we say “quieter,” why can’t we say “silenter”? And if we can say “nimbler” instead of “more nimble,” why can’t we say (we never would) “agiler” instead of “more agile,” or (we wouldn’t either) “Farmer Brown’s land is fallower than Farmer Jones’s,” just as we say, “The water at this end of the lake is shallower than at that end?” Perhaps one of you can figure it out. I haven’t been able to.

Can it be that there simply is no rule for the comparative form of two-syllable adjectives not ending in “y,” but simply a relatively small number of such words that can take “-er,” each of which has to be learned as a case in itself from the experience of hearing other people use it? And is the only reason that “pleasanter” sounds right to me and not to Rabbi Hammerman that I have heard others use it and he hasn’t? Or is there some other factor at work here that I can’t put my finger on? If you have any thoughts about it, let me know.

Questions for Philologos can be sent to philologos@forward.com


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Can you relate?
  • The Forverts' "Bintel Brief" advice column ran for more than 65 years. Now it's getting a second life — as a cartoon.
  • Half of this Hillel's members believe Jesus was the Messiah.
  • Vinyl isn't just for hipsters and hippies. Israeli photographer Eilan Paz documents the most astonishing record collections from around the world:http://jd.fo/g3IyM
  • Could Spider-Man be Jewish? Andrew Garfield thinks so.
  • Most tasteless video ever? A new video shows Jesus Christ dying at Auschwitz.
  • "It’s the smell that hits me first — musty, almost sweet, emanating from the green felt that cradles each piece of silver cutlery in its own place." Only one week left to submit! Tell us the story of your family's Jewish heirloom.
  • Mazel tov to Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky!
  • If it's true, it's pretty terrifying news.
  • “My mom went to cook at the White House and all I got was this tiny piece of leftover raspberry ganache."
  • Planning on catching "Fading Gigolo" this weekend? Read our review.
  • A new initiative will spend $300 million a year towards strengthening Israel's relationship with the Diaspora. http://jd.fo/q3Iaj Is this money spent wisely?
  • Lusia Horowitz left pre-state Israel to fight fascism in Spain — and wound up being captured by the Nazis and sent to die at Auschwitz. Share her remarkable story — told in her letters.
  • Vered Guttman doesn't usually get nervous about cooking for 20 people, even for Passover. But last night was a bit different. She was cooking for the Obamas at the White House Seder.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.