Despite Weak Senate Performance, Hagel May Yet Win Pentagon Post

By Reuters

Published February 01, 2013.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Chuck Hagel’s cautious testimony may not have won converts during his contentious nomination hearing for U.S. defense secretary, but it appeared on Friday not to have cost support he will need to be confirmed as the new Pentagon chief.

Republicans hammered Hagel when he appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday, with some of the fiercest questioning coming from those who had served alongside him during his two terms as a Republican senator from Nebraska.

Critics said Hagel performed poorly at times, speaking hesitantly, seeming tired and often unprepared for some of the sharpest queries about over his past controversial statements on Israel, Iran and U.S. nuclear strategy.

But the White House stood by Hagel on Friday and none of the Senate’s Democrats have publicly abandoned him, meaning minority Republicans would have to resort to procedural tactics to try to block his confirmation.

Hagel’s nomination appears likely to clear its first hurdle - approval by the Senate Armed Services Committee - on a straight party-line vote. The earliest that vote could come is Thursday, Feb. 7.

Hagel’s performance seemed to embolden some Republicans to come out strongly against him.

Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois issued a statement on Friday criticizing Hagel’s view of Iran and his testimony that he supported President Barack Obama’s policy of “containment of Iran.” Kirk said he would not vote for him.

Passed a note during the hearing, Hagel said he had misspoken and corrected himself. Obama says his policy is stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, not containing Tehran after it does.

But other Republican senators said that, while they will vote against Hagel, they will not stop his nomination from reaching the Senate floor, where it needs a simple majority to pass.

“Certainly my strong inclination would be that this is a vote that should be done by a majority rather than a 60-vote standard,” Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri said on Fox News.

He referred to the 60 votes - all 55 Democrats, plus five Republicans - Hagel supporters would need to clear a procedural hurdle known as a filibuster.

Republican aides said they had had no word that any senator planned a filibuster, which has not been used against a Cabinet nominee since 1975.

One senior Republican aide said a successful filibuster seemed unlikely. Getting five Republicans to oppose one “doesn’t seem to be an impossible hurdle to clear,” the aide said.

DEMOCRATS CONFIDENT

Democrats praised Hagel, a decorated Vietnam War veteran who would be the first former enlisted man to lead the Defense Department.

“He’ll be fine,” a senior Senate Democratic aide said. “Nothing happened yesterday that has a shelf life beyond the 24-hour news cycle.”

Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat who is on the Armed Services panel, said on MSNBC he was convinced Hagel was qualified to lead the Pentagon after what he termed a “very tough, grueling” day of testimony.

Democrats complained that some Republicans were disrespectful in their questioning of Hagel, 66, which focused on his views of Israel, Iran, the Iraq war, and U.S. nuclear strategy.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said the number of “yes” votes for Hagel had increased since the hearing - which began at 9:30 a.m. and did not end until almost 6:30 p.m.

“I think Senator Hagel answered the questions appropriately and did a fine job,” Carney said, asserting that some of the lines of questioning had amounted to “badgering” of Hagel by some senators.

Within the Obama administration, there was a view that Hagel’s performance could have been better, but that officials had seen no indication that his chances had been diminished by the difficult confirmation hearing.

The White House was largely satisfied with how Hagel had done, a U.S. official said.

At the Pentagon, where Hagel had spent many hours preparing for the hearing, some officials said privately that they did not see anything surprising in the attacks that echoed opponents’ statements against Hagel since Obama nominated him.

Hagel has been the subject of an intense lobbying effort seeing to label him as an enemy of Israel, soft on Iran and opponent of equal rights for gays and lesbians in the military.

So far, he has picked up scant Republican support. Republican Mississippi Senator Thad Cochran has said he will back the nomination and others have not ruled it out. (Additional reporting by Kim Dixon, Susan Cornwell, Thomas Ferraro, Phil Stewart and Steve Holland; Editing by Warren Strobel and Eric Walsh)


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • "Mark your calendars: It was on Sunday, July 20, that the momentum turned against Israel." J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis on Israel's ground operation in Gaza:
  • What do you think?
  • "To everyone who is reading this article and saying, “Yes, but… Hamas,” I would ask you to just stop with the “buts.” Take a single moment and allow yourself to feel this tremendous loss. Lay down your arms and grieve for the children of Gaza."
  • Professor Dan Markel, 41 years old, was found shot and killed in his Tallahassee home on Friday. Jay Michaelson can't explain the death, just grieve for it.
  • Employees complained that the food they received to end the daily fast during the holy month of Ramadan was not enough (no non-kosher food is allowed in the plant). The next day, they were dismissed.
  • Why are peace activists getting beat up in Tel Aviv? http://jd.fo/s4YsG
  • Backstreet's...not back.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.