Despite Weak Senate Performance, Hagel May Yet Win Pentagon Post

By Reuters

Published February 01, 2013.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Chuck Hagel’s cautious testimony may not have won converts during his contentious nomination hearing for U.S. defense secretary, but it appeared on Friday not to have cost support he will need to be confirmed as the new Pentagon chief.

Republicans hammered Hagel when he appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday, with some of the fiercest questioning coming from those who had served alongside him during his two terms as a Republican senator from Nebraska.

Critics said Hagel performed poorly at times, speaking hesitantly, seeming tired and often unprepared for some of the sharpest queries about over his past controversial statements on Israel, Iran and U.S. nuclear strategy.

But the White House stood by Hagel on Friday and none of the Senate’s Democrats have publicly abandoned him, meaning minority Republicans would have to resort to procedural tactics to try to block his confirmation.

Hagel’s nomination appears likely to clear its first hurdle - approval by the Senate Armed Services Committee - on a straight party-line vote. The earliest that vote could come is Thursday, Feb. 7.

Hagel’s performance seemed to embolden some Republicans to come out strongly against him.

Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois issued a statement on Friday criticizing Hagel’s view of Iran and his testimony that he supported President Barack Obama’s policy of “containment of Iran.” Kirk said he would not vote for him.

Passed a note during the hearing, Hagel said he had misspoken and corrected himself. Obama says his policy is stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, not containing Tehran after it does.

But other Republican senators said that, while they will vote against Hagel, they will not stop his nomination from reaching the Senate floor, where it needs a simple majority to pass.

“Certainly my strong inclination would be that this is a vote that should be done by a majority rather than a 60-vote standard,” Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri said on Fox News.

He referred to the 60 votes - all 55 Democrats, plus five Republicans - Hagel supporters would need to clear a procedural hurdle known as a filibuster.

Republican aides said they had had no word that any senator planned a filibuster, which has not been used against a Cabinet nominee since 1975.

One senior Republican aide said a successful filibuster seemed unlikely. Getting five Republicans to oppose one “doesn’t seem to be an impossible hurdle to clear,” the aide said.

DEMOCRATS CONFIDENT

Democrats praised Hagel, a decorated Vietnam War veteran who would be the first former enlisted man to lead the Defense Department.

“He’ll be fine,” a senior Senate Democratic aide said. “Nothing happened yesterday that has a shelf life beyond the 24-hour news cycle.”

Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat who is on the Armed Services panel, said on MSNBC he was convinced Hagel was qualified to lead the Pentagon after what he termed a “very tough, grueling” day of testimony.

Democrats complained that some Republicans were disrespectful in their questioning of Hagel, 66, which focused on his views of Israel, Iran, the Iraq war, and U.S. nuclear strategy.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said the number of “yes” votes for Hagel had increased since the hearing - which began at 9:30 a.m. and did not end until almost 6:30 p.m.

“I think Senator Hagel answered the questions appropriately and did a fine job,” Carney said, asserting that some of the lines of questioning had amounted to “badgering” of Hagel by some senators.

Within the Obama administration, there was a view that Hagel’s performance could have been better, but that officials had seen no indication that his chances had been diminished by the difficult confirmation hearing.

The White House was largely satisfied with how Hagel had done, a U.S. official said.

At the Pentagon, where Hagel had spent many hours preparing for the hearing, some officials said privately that they did not see anything surprising in the attacks that echoed opponents’ statements against Hagel since Obama nominated him.

Hagel has been the subject of an intense lobbying effort seeing to label him as an enemy of Israel, soft on Iran and opponent of equal rights for gays and lesbians in the military.

So far, he has picked up scant Republican support. Republican Mississippi Senator Thad Cochran has said he will back the nomination and others have not ruled it out. (Additional reporting by Kim Dixon, Susan Cornwell, Thomas Ferraro, Phil Stewart and Steve Holland; Editing by Warren Strobel and Eric Walsh)


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • The rose petals have settled, and Andi has made her (Jewish?) choice. We look back on the #Bachelorette finale:
  • "Despite the great pain and sadness surrounding a captured soldier, this should not shape the face of this particular conflict – not in making concessions and not in negotiations, not in sobering assessments of this operation’s achievements or the need to either retreat or move forward." Do you agree?
  • Why genocide is always wrong, period. And the fact that some are talking about it shows just how much damage the war in Gaza has already done.
  • Construction workers found a 75-year-old deli sign behind a closing Harlem bodega earlier this month. Should it be preserved?
  • "The painful irony in Israel’s current dilemma is that it has been here before." Read J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis of the conflict:
  • Law professor Dan Markel waited a shocking 19 minutes for an ambulance as he lay dying after being ambushed in his driveway. Read the stunning 911 transcript as neighbor pleaded for help.
  • Happy birthday to the Boy Who Lived! July 31 marks the day that Harry Potter — and his creator, J.K. Rowling — first entered the world. Harry is a loyal Gryffindorian, a matchless wizard, a native Parseltongue speaker, and…a Jew?
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels. http://jd.fo/g4cjH
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.