Jerualem — An Oscar-nominated Israeli documentary has brought little joy to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, the focus of the film’s criticism of Israel’s policy toward the Palestinians.
Featuring searingly confessional interviews with six former chiefs of the shadowy security service Shin Bet, “The Gatekeepers” portrays the 46-year-old West Bank occupation and Jewish ultranationalism as threats to Israel’s survival.
Its run for Sunday’s Academy Awards comes at an awkward time for the conservative Netanyahu. He narrowly won an election last month that favoured centrist rivals who, echoing world powers, demand he revive long-stalled Palestinian statehood talks.
Usually quick to congratulate Israelis who succeed abroad, Netanyahu has kept mum on “The Gatekeepers”, which an aide said he had not seen. Reaction from other officials has been frosty.
Vice Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon said the Shin Bet veterans’ interviews, in which they discuss episodes such as the agency-ordered killing of two captured Gazan bus hijackers and a plot by Jewish extremists to blow up a major Muslim shrine in Jerusalem, had been edited “to serve the Palestinian narrative”.
“What was presented there was presented in a really one-sided manner, and therefore the film is slanted,” Yaalon, a member of Netanyahu’s Likud party and a former military chief, told Israel’s Army Radio.
Asked about the film during last month’s World Economic Forum in Davos, Defence Minister Ehud Barak, the lone centrist in Netanyahu’s outgoing coalition, offered tepid praise for its “testament to the fact that in Israel you can talk more freely, perhaps, than in any other place”.
SPANNING DIVIDES
Also among the five contenders for the best documentary Oscar is “Five Broken Cameras”, a sympathetic account of the Palestinian struggle against land seizures involved in the erection of Israel’s West Bank barrier.
The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.