Israel Hopes To Undermine Iran Nuclear Thaw

Benjamin Netanyahu Pushes New Demands for Pact

getty images

By Reuters

Published December 22, 2013.

(page 2 of 2)

The United States views engagement with the new, relatively moderate government in Iran as a chance to defuse more than three decades of tensions.

Asked about Netanyahu’s push to broaden Geneva negotiations, White House National Security Council spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan said talks were focused exclusively on the nuclear issue.

“However, it is important to note that progress on the nuclear issue does not change our resolve in pushing back against Iranian support for terrorism, threats against our friends and partners, and violations of human rights,” she said.

“TOO HIGH A BAR”

Independent experts doubt that Iran, already clinging to nuclear projects it insists are only for peaceful purposes, would agree to a wider clampdown on missile technologies which it could argue are crucial for its civilian space programme.

Isaac Ben-Israel, an aerospace expert and former strategic weapons designer with Israel’s Defence Ministry, said Netanyahu was setting “too high a bar” on Iran’s ballistic missiles.

He said those were developed in parallel with Tehran’s fledgling space programme, and predicted the Iranians would treat any move against their missile arsenal as undermining a national scientific endeavour.

“They won’t give up the space missiles. That will never happen,” said Ben-Israel, who is now a professor of security and diplomacy studies at Tel Aviv University.

Earlier this month, Iran said it sent a second live monkey into space and brought it back safely, in a fresh demonstration of the country’s missile capabilities.

The West worries that long-range ballistic technology used to propel Iranian satellites into orbit could be put to use dispatching nuclear warheads to a target.

An Israeli official said the Netanyahu government regarded Iran’s space programme as cover for its ballistic missile programme: “It’s not peaceful just like Iran’s nuclear projects aren’t peaceful. There’s no reason to draw fake distinctions.”

The official did not offer how Iran might reform its enmity toward Israel. The Iranians, who deny their nuclear programme is aimed at developing weapons, accuse Israel and its own assumed atomic arsenal of being the real menace to Middle East security.

Gary Samore, Obama’s former nuclear non-proliferation czar and now a Harvard University scholar, saw value to Israel’s calls even if they ultimately go unmet.

“I think it’s unlikely that Iran will agree to include its ballistic missile programme as part of a nuclear deal,” he said.

“However, ballistic missiles and many other issues, such as Iran’s hostile policy toward Israel, should be on the agenda if and when we ever reach agreement to resolve the nuclear issue.”

A senior Western diplomat said Netanyahu was making “crazy maximalist demands” that even people in his inner circle recognised could not be met.

Giora Eiland, a former Israeli national security adviser, inferred another tactical tack on the part of Netanyahu.

“He might be introducing a demand to the negotiations that could later be removed as a kind of concession, with Iran expected to make concessions in turn,” Eiland said.



Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.