Holocaust Museum Urges Ukraine To Examine Its History of Anti-Semitism

What Will Secret Police Archives Reveal?

On Trial: Menakhem Mendl Beilis, whose blood libel trial took place in Ukraine in 1913, with his family in the Russian Empire of the 1910’s.
On Trial: Menakhem Mendl Beilis, whose blood libel trial took place in Ukraine in 1913, with his family in the Russian Empire of the 1910’s.

By Nathan Guttman

Published June 16, 2014, issue of June 20, 2014.

As Ukraine grapples with political upheaval and threats to its territorial integrity, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum is confronting the country’s post-revolution government with another, no less difficult challenge: contending with its past treatment of Jews.

The museum has urged the new government in Kiev to set up an international commission to examine its troubled relations throughout the 20th century with the country’s Jewish community.

Aware of the country’s current turmoil, a delegation of museum officials visiting Kiev presented the proposal as an idea, not necessarily as an immediate priority to be implemented quickly. But according to museum director Sara Bloomfield, the initial response from Ukrainian officials was positive.

“In this country — you can’t really separate communism, Nazism and anti-Semitism,” Bloomfield said in a June 8 phone interview from Kiev. She noted that discussing anti-Semitism and teaching about it in Ukraine should span from the early twentieth century, including the infamous 1913 blood libel trial of Menachem Mendel Beilis through the Stalinist persecution of Jews and the collaboration of some Ukrainian nationalists with the Nazis during the Third Reich’s occupation of the country.

Bloomfield visited Ukraine during the first week of June to meet with representatives of the newly-elected government and with scholars and members of the Jewish community. Her talks focused on practical issues, including gaining full access to Communist-era archives. But Bloomfield also sought to begin a process of dialogue aimed at getting Ukraine to reckon with its own history.

“Ukraine is in dire need of a new, more honest and complex historical narrative that reflects all the difficult issues of its history, including its darkest chapters,” wrote Bloomfield and her colleague, Vadim Altskan, a project manager in the museum’s international archival program, in a Global Post op-ed published before their trip to Ukraine. “It will not be easy, but Ukraine has a unique opportunity to validate the importance of an honest reckoning with history, recognizing that only a democratic nation can guarantee the security, freedom and prosperity of all its citizens.”

Following her meetings in Kiev, Bloomfield was cautious despite the positive response from Ukrainian officials to her idea of establishing a commission. “The reality is that right now, the country has many very urgent issues to deal with,” she said.

Bloomfield’s proposal is modeled after a similar endeavor in post-Communist Romania. The International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania, which concluded its work in 2004, was chaired by Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel, Romania’s most well-known survivor, and was made up of international experts. It produced a 400-page report that not only set the record straight regarding the number of victims and the role played by Romanians in aiding the Nazis, but also provided recommendations regarding Holocaust education and remembrance in Romania.

For Ukraine, such a commission would require a broader mandate, looking not only at the Holocaust but also at a history of anti-Semitism and hostility toward Jews before and after the Nazi takeover.



Would you like to receive updates about new stories?






















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.