Taking Tehran at its Word

By Abraham Foxman

Published November 04, 2005, issue of November 04, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Shortly after the immediate and strong international reaction to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s comment that Israel should be “wiped off the map,” his foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, indicated that this position was nothing new: The Islamic regime had always viewed Israel that way, ever since the Khomeini revolution in 1979.

Mottaki is correct. From the very beginning, Khomeni and his crowd have spent much effort trying to delegitimize Zionism and the Jewish state. Yet there was something different about Ahmadinejad’s statement last week, and we need to focus in on that in order to understand the reactions and to assess what to do about it.

The fundamental difference lies in the fact that earlier Iranian anti-Israel propaganda fell into the category of rhetoric — dangerous because such hatred poisons minds and sets the stage for destructive behavior, but nonetheless only rhetoric. Ideally, such rhetoric needed to be dealt with early on, but the reluctance to do so stemmed from a variety of reasons, most of all because of a lack of a sense of urgency.

What means did Iran have to destroy Israel? The fact that through the years Iran was a major state sponsor of terrorism, in particular of Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, was not deemed sufficient by Western nations and the United Nations to take Iranian threats too seriously. And, of course, it wasn’t irrelevant that Iran had large oil supplies.

Ahmadinejad’s statement, however, sends out very different messages. One can’t ignore the fact that the language used is not merely one of delegitimizing the State of Israel. At a time when it is believed that Iran will be able to produce deliverable nuclear weapons sometime in the next two to four years, a threat of the kind that came from the Iranian president is no longer mere rhetoric.

I am one who is always hesitant to make comparisons of today’s evils in the world to that of Adolf Hitler. But now is an appropriate time to do so. Hitler made clear in “Mein Kampf” his goals of German world domination and the demise of the Jews. The world should have paid attention, but who was Hitler?

By 1939, with Nazi Germany a military power of the first order, Hitler warned that if war would come it would result in “the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.” Hitler’s threats were no longer seen as idle. Unfortunately, the world awakened very late to the threat of war and too late to protect European Jewry.

The strong reaction to the Ahmadinejad statement — which reflects a recognition that Iran’s threats can be backed up — could be a turning point in international dealings with Tehran, but only if concerted action follows. What is needed now is a full-scale campaign to highlight the danger that the fundamentalist Islamic regime poses not only to Israel, but to the world. In doing so, major and ongoing efforts must be made to persuade Russia and China to allow the implementation of U.N. sanctions against Iran.

Declarations by the international community that Iran cannot be allowed to possess nuclear weapons must be made credible by action. Pressure must be brought to bear on Iran in every way possible in order to convince Tehran to give up on its nuclear program — and if all else fails, a military response must remain an option.

The Iranian president’s bluntness may have inadvertently provided an important wake-up call to the world. The question is, will Western civilization respond in time?

Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, is author of “Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism” (HarperSanFrancisco, 2003).






Find us on Facebook!
  • “My mom went to cook at the White House and all I got was this tiny piece of leftover raspberry ganache."
  • Planning on catching "Fading Gigolo" this weekend? Read our review.
  • A new initiative will spend $300 million a year towards strengthening Israel's relationship with the Diaspora. http://jd.fo/q3Iaj Is this money spent wisely?
  • Lusia Horowitz left pre-state Israel to fight fascism in Spain — and wound up being captured by the Nazis and sent to die at Auschwitz. Share her remarkable story — told in her letters.
  • Vered Guttman doesn't usually get nervous about cooking for 20 people, even for Passover. But last night was a bit different. She was cooking for the Obamas at the White House Seder.
  • A grumpy Jewish grandfather is wary of his granddaughter's celebrating Easter with the in-laws. But the Seesaw says it might just make her appreciate Judaism more. What do you think?
  • “Twist and Shout.” “Under the Boardwalk.” “Brown-Eyed Girl.” What do these great songs have in common? A forgotten Jewish songwriter. We tracked him down.
  • What can we learn from tragedies like the rampage in suburban Kansas City? For one thing, we must keep our eyes on the real threats that we as Jews face.
  • When is a legume not necessarily a legume? Philologos has the answer.
  • "Sometime in my childhood, I realized that the Exodus wasn’t as remote or as faceless as I thought it was, because I knew a former slave. His name was Hersh Nemes, and he was my grandfather." Share this moving Passover essay!
  • Getting ready for Seder? Chag Sameach! http://jd.fo/q3LO2
  • "We are not so far removed from the tragedies of the past, and as Jews sit down to the Seder meal, this event is a teachable moment of how the hatred of Jews-as-Other is still alive and well. It is not realistic to be complacent."
  • Aperitif Cocktail, Tequila Shot, Tom Collins or Vodka Soda — Which son do you relate to?
  • Elvis craved bacon on tour. Michael Jackson craved matzo ball soup. We've got the recipe.
  • This is the face of hatred.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.