Jewish Groups Press for Iran Sanctions

By Ori Nir

Published September 23, 2005, issue of September 23, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

WASHINGTON —As Washington struggles to secure world support for slapping international sanctions on Iran over its alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons, Jewish organization are stepping up their efforts to trigger a crackdown on Tehran.

Pro-Israel activists in Washington are pressing Congress to tighten American sanctions on Iran. And last week, on the margins of the United Nations General Assembly, Jewish communal leaders in New York urged world leaders, including Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, to act against Tehran.

The appeal to Singh — to support American and European efforts to bring the issue of anti-Iran sanctions before the United Nations Security Council — came after a meeting earlier this month between Jewish communal leaders and U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. At the meeting, Rice expressed frustration with India’s refusal to support American and European policy on Iran.

Washington is trying to convince India, as well as Russia and China, to join in adopting an international hard line against Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Sources told the Forward that the Jewish activists who met with Rice took her comments as a plea to use their influence with India’s government and urge it to cooperate with the Bush administration.

The assistant national director of the Anti-Defamation League, Kenneth Jacobson, who attended the powwow with Singh, reported that the result of the meeting with the Indian leader was disappointing.

Singh “expressed a reluctance to rush towards the Security Council,” Jacobson told the Forward. “We were left feeling that there was a long way to go before getting his government to be willing to support” referring Iran’s nuclear program to the Security Council.

Jewish communal leaders reported similar disappointment with Russia’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov. “We weren’t very happy with him either,” Jacobson said. “He didn’t give us any indication that Russia was going to support” a Security Council resolution for Iran’s nuclear program.

Other meetings that Jewish communal leaders had in New York last week with foreign leaders also focused on Iran’s nuclear ambitions and on the prospects of reining them in through international sanctions.

In his speech before the U.N. General Assembly, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reportedly called for the creation of a committee to investigate Israel’s nuclear activities. He unequivocally affirmed his country’s intention to continue enriching unranium — over American and European objections — although he said the nuclear fuel is being produced for peaceful purposes, not to make a bomb.

The Iranian leader made the statements after effectively breaking off negotiations with European Union representatives aimed at resolving the international crisis over Tehran’s nuclear program.

A referral to the Security Council requires a consensus among board members of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Currently such a consensus does not exist. Russia, China, Brazil and the agency’s director general, Mohamed ElBaradei, all oppose an immediate referral of the Iranian case to the Security Council. The agency’s board of governors is composed of 35 member states, with 14 belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement. These representatives met this week to adopt a collective position. According to reports from the agency’s headquarters in Vienna, 12 out of the 14 nonaligned countries opposed the referral.

The Bush administration and its European allies are rushing to secure an early referral before this month’s election of the organization’s next board. The election is expected to result in the inclusion of even more nonaligned states.

“We think time is running out,” Jacobson said. “We think there is a certain never-never-land quality to all of this. We will wake up one day, and we will find that we’re stuck” with a nuclear Iran.

Meanwhile, pro-Israel lobbyists on Capitol Hill are cajoling members of Congress to support the Iran Freedom Support Act, which would expand the existing American sanctions on companies that invest more than $20 annually in Iran’s oil and gas sectors. The bill would tighten sanctions on companies that invest in Iran’s energy industry in the hopes of blocking money that could be used to produce nuclear arms.

The bill also provides for assistance to pro-democracy forces within Iran, and funding for independent media broadcasts to the country. The House of Representatives’ Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Florida Republican, and Howard Berman, a California Democrat, are sponsoring the proposed legislation. The sponsors of the Senate version are Rick Santorum, a Pennsylvania Republican, and Evan Bayh, an Indiana Democrat.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Washington’s pro-Israel lobby, has made pushing for sanctions on Iran its number-one priority in recent months.

“Iran is rapidly approaching the point of no return, and in order to prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons, concerted diplomatic and economic pressure must be imposed,” Aipac spokesman Josh Block said. “Stopping Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon should be a priority for anyone who is concerned about stability in the Middle East.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.