As Modernity Beckoned

History

By Ilan Stavans

Published September 15, 2006, issue of September 15, 2006.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Ladino Rabbinic Literature & Ottoman Sephardic Culture By Matthias B. Lehmann Indiana University Press, 280 pages, $39.95.

Until the end of the 15th century, the Iberian Peninsula was not only a Muslim enclave but also a site of dialogue between three religions: Christianity, Judaism and Islam. The expulsion of Jews and Arabs irrigated their communities throughout the Mediterranean Basin, in what eventually became the Ottoman Empire. There, again, Jews and Muslims coexisted — or better, they thrived.

Matthias B. Lehmann, who teaches at Indiana University, is the author of an invigorating and thought-provoking study about the manifestations of rabbinic literature in the Ottoman region during the 19th century. At this time, the plethora of academic dissertations on similar aspects of Ashkenazic culture gives the impression that the Jewish sphere of influence reached only to the borders of the Pale of Settlement. But, lately, perhaps as a result of the way that American Jews are redefining their identity, a strong interest in other areas of the world, especially the Sephardic constellation, has garnered attention. And in times likes these, during which East and West are drastically polarized, nurturing such an interest might be taken as a sign of hope.

Lehmann is a clear thinker and an engaging writer. His focus is on the strategies that the Ottoman Jews, as a minority group, developed to find a balance as modernity knocked at the door. More concretely, he is interested in the crossroads where morality and culture meet. He opposes the nearsighted perception that rabbinic responsa in Ladino was only that, a response; instead, he perceives it as an agent of transformation. That transformation started with ethical modes within the confines of tradition. It ended in secularism. Indeed, his central thesis is that rabbinic literature set the foundation for Ottoman maskilim to rewrite the European classics, turn women into an engine of emancipation, and push the Sephardim to embrace secularism.

Rabbinic literature in the vernacular, Lehmann states, was neither difficult nor long-winded. Its most crucial quality was accessibility, for its objective was to translate the ideal of a Jewish household to modern times. He begins by meditating on Jacob Huli’s multivolume treatise, Me’am Lo’ez, an attempt to adapt the Torah for the masses by recommending ways to integrate ritual and contemporary life. The first volume was published in 1730. Huli set the stage for a number of other popular ethical manuals that made recommendations on all sorts of daily activities, from education to sexuality, from Zionism to technology.

Language and translation are Lehmann’s prime motifs. The Ottoman rabbis, he suggests, might not have been original in their viewpoint, but they were definitely committed to adaptability. Through a series of socializing institutions, such as the meldados (study groups in which musar literature was debated and, along with it, political, educational and cultural topics), Jews in the Mediterranean Basin reflected on their status. Like Yiddish among Ashkenazim, Ladino served as a unifying resource. For as the Sephardim struggled to find a balancing act between faith and progress, their grasp of the sacred tongue became tenuous. And although they were fluent in French, Arabic, Turkish, Greek, Slavic and other languages, ethical debates were inaccessible unless they were rendered in the vernacular. The sections in which Lehmann discusses the elasticity of Ladino as a standard vehicle of communication are enlightening. He makes it resemble Spanglish in America, a cut-and-paste of various linguistic sources.

Lehmann is an anti-romantic. He’s scrupulous about his historical sources — recognizing, for instance, that the availability of rabbinic books doesn’t mean they were read. In fact, there isn’t any quantifiable information about patterns of distribution. Happily, nothing stops him from offering an honest picture of a minority that, on the verge of the 20th century, pushed its surroundings to embrace such principles as freedom, democracy and, yes, tolerance. Although he doesn’t dwell on it, the reader is able to recognize from Lehmann’s study that such intellectual giants as Alberto Cohen and Elias Canetti, byproducts of Greece’s and Bulgaria’s Sephardic community, respectively, are all Huli’s brainchildren. An astonishing genealogical feat any way one looks at it.

Ilan Stavans is Lewis-Sebring professor in Latin American and Latino culture at Amherst College. His latest book is “The Disappearance: A Novella and Stories” (Northwestern University Press).






Find us on Facebook!
  • "I’ve never bought illegal drugs, but I imagine a small-time drug deal to feel a bit like buying hummus underground in Brooklyn."
  • We try to show things that get less exposed to the public here. We don’t look to document things that are nice or that people would like. We don’t try to show this place as a beautiful place.”
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.