The Case of Jacob Goldberg v. Father Christmas

By Adam Grace

Published December 24, 2004, issue of December 24, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Sir, it says here that you deliver toys to ALL the good boys and girls. Is that correct?

Claus: Yes, but it’s not like it’s a contract. It’s just…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: It does use the word “ALL” doesn’t it?

Claus: Yes, it does.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: In fact, you don’t actually deliver toys to all the good boys and girls, do you?

Claus: Well…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You don’t do that, do you?

Claus: No. No I don’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Mr. Claus, on the night of December 24, 2003, you didn’t deliver any toys to little Jacob [pointing to plaintiff]. Isn’t that right?

Claus: I can’t really remember, I mean there are millions of kids…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Mr. Claus, I put before you what has been marked as Plaintiff’s Exhibit 32. Do you recognize that?

Claus: Yes.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Could you tell us what it is?

Claus: It’s an excerpt from our master list of all the good children who had toys delivered to them on the night of December 24, 2003.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: And the excerpt includes all last names beginning with the letters “Gol,” isn’t that right?

Claus: Yes.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: And Jacob’s last name isn’t there, is it?

Claus [thumbing through exhibit]: No, it isn’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You have no reason to doubt the accuracy of your own list, do you?

Claus: No. We’re pretty good about those things.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: So, in fact, based on Exhibit 32, you have no reason to believe that any toys were delivered to little Jacob that night, do you?

Claus: No, I don’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Now, at any time prior to December 24, 2003, did you make any inquiry into whether Jacob had been a good boy?

Claus: Well, I’d have to see the lists.

Plaintiff’s Attorney [handing defendant another exhibit]: Feel free.

Claus [thumbing through exhibit]: No. It appears that we did not.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: So at the time you skipped over Jacob’s house, you had no idea, one way or the other, whether Jacob had been naughty or nice?

Claus: No, I didn’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You didn’t even bother to ask.

Defense Attorney: Objection.

Judge: Sustained.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Sir, no one with Jacob’s last name got any toys that night, did they?

Claus: Can I see the other list?

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Well, you don’t have to look at the list to know that you’ve never delivered toys to anyone named “Goldberg,” do you?

Claus: I don’t…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: I’ll rephrase it. You’ve never delivered toys to anyone with the last name Goldberg, have you?

Claus: No. No, I haven’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: In fact, you’ve never even bothered to check whether any boy or girl with the last name Goldberg was naughty or nice, have you?

Claus: No.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: And that’s because despite your promise to deliver presents to ALL boys and girls, you don’t give anything to Jewish children, do you?

Claus: Well, they don’t believe in me. Why should I?

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You exist, don’t you?

Claus: Yes, I exist. Of course I exist.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: And you exist even if some children don’t believe in you, isn’t that right?

Claus: Yeah, of course.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: So, it doesn’t really matter if a child doesn’t believe in you, does it?

Claus: Well, why should I break my neck…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Before delivering presents to the Christian children, do you ever check and see if they believe in you?

Claus: No, that would be next to imp…

Plaintiff’s Attorney: You don’t, do you?

Claus: No, I don’t.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: But Jewish children are automatically excluded from getting presents, aren’t they?

Claus: Yes.

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Mr. Claus, did it ever occur to you that little Jacob Goldberg might not be Jewish?

Claus: Oh, Christ.

Adam Grace is an attorney and the father of two children who have been very good.






Find us on Facebook!
  • The rose petals have settled, and Andi has made her (Jewish?) choice. We look back on the #Bachelorette finale:
  • "Despite the great pain and sadness surrounding a captured soldier, this should not shape the face of this particular conflict – not in making concessions and not in negotiations, not in sobering assessments of this operation’s achievements or the need to either retreat or move forward." Do you agree?
  • Why genocide is always wrong, period. And the fact that some are talking about it shows just how much damage the war in Gaza has already done.
  • Construction workers found a 75-year-old deli sign behind a closing Harlem bodega earlier this month. Should it be preserved?
  • "The painful irony in Israel’s current dilemma is that it has been here before." Read J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis of the conflict:
  • Law professor Dan Markel waited a shocking 19 minutes for an ambulance as he lay dying after being ambushed in his driveway. Read the stunning 911 transcript as neighbor pleaded for help.
  • Happy birthday to the Boy Who Lived! July 31 marks the day that Harry Potter — and his creator, J.K. Rowling — first entered the world. Harry is a loyal Gryffindorian, a matchless wizard, a native Parseltongue speaker, and…a Jew?
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels. http://jd.fo/g4cjH
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.