Leading Liberal Mag Yanks Ad Denying Holocaust

By Miriam Colton

Published April 30, 2004, issue of April 30, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

A leading U.S. Holocaust-denial group’s advertisements were pulled from a liberal weekly, The Nation, after protests from editorial staffers and Jewish organizations.

The May 3 issue of the magazine featured a promotional ad for the book “The Founding Myths of Modern Israel.” The ad claimed that the book dissects historical myths used to justify Zionist aggression, including “the most sacred of Jewish-Zionist icons, the Holocaust story.”

Placed by the Institute for Historical Review, an organization dedicated to refuting accepted Holocaust history, the ad was scheduled to run in six issues. But at a hastily convened meeting, several editors and business executives at The Nation decided that the claims in the ad violated the magazine’s policy not to print “patently fraudulent” ads.

“We have the right to refuse ads on the one hand, and on the other hand we have a presumption in favor of taking ads where we politically disagree,” said Victor Navasky, publisher and editorial director of The Nation, one of the country’s oldest liberal magazines. “Those two principles are in tension in a case like this… and here the argument that it was inappropriate prevailed.”

Navasky said the magazine has not adopted a general policy regarding the printing of Holocaust-denial ads, though the issue of advertising guidelines was hastily put on the agenda of the magazine’s biannual board meeting, scheduled to start at the end of this week.

The initial decision to run the Holocaust-denial ad was criticized on April 21 in separate correspondence to The Nation from the director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman, and Rafael Medoff, the director of the David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, near Philadelphia. That same day, the magazine’s advertising manager, Leigh Novog, sent an e-mail to Medoff, stating that his complaint had “prompted a meeting of The Nation’s Advertising and Acceptability Committee,” after which the magazine requested that the Institute for Historical Review “not run advertising in future issues.”

Medoff quickly issued a statement claiming credit for the decision. Navasky told the Forward that the ad was brought to his attention by an editor who found it to be offensive.

Novog sent an April 21 letter explaining the magazine’s decision to Mark Weber, director of the Institute for Historical Review.

“I am disappointed to write you today,” Novog wrote. “I am aware of the position the Institute for Historical Review takes on the holocaust. It was my belief that The Nation would support my decision to solicit the IHR for advertising in a media outlet that would welcome discussion of this controversial viewpoint.”

In his letter to Weber, Novog quoted from The Nation’s ban on fraudulent ads, which was published in a 1979 issue of the magazine. Novog also detailed the refund being sent with the letter: “Mark, the IHR rendered a check to The Nation for $1,600 for 6 one-eighth page black and white ads,” Novog wrote. “One insertion ran on 5/3. The Nation is returning a check for $1,333.33.”

This was the first time that Weber’s organization ran an ad in The Nation, according to Peter Rothberg, an associate publisher at the magazine.

The IHR did place the same ad in the Washington Post book section in 2001. An advertising manager at the Post told the Forward that it slipped through by mistake and that the procedure was immediately revamped so it wouldn’t happen again.

The Nation controversy was the second one last week surrounding Weber’s Southern California-based organization. Weber stepped in after the Turn Verein, a German social and sports club in Sacramento, canceled plans earlier this month to rent its facilities to a Holocaust revisionist conference only days before the two-day event was scheduled to start. Funded in part by the IHR, the event was organized by the European American Cultural Council, a smaller Holocaust-denial group with a membership of approximately 600.

After the Turn Verein decided not to host the event, saying that it had only just learned in a local newspaper that the conference involved Holocaust deniers and white supremacists, Weber quickly organized a truncated one-day gathering on April 24 that attracted 130 participants to an undisclosed location in Sacramento.

The president of the European American Cultural Council, Walter Mueller, refused to participate in the rescheduled conference, since Weber decided to accept the assistance of members of white supremacist groups, including the National Alliance.

In an interview with the Forward, Weber said that his organization challenges the notion that 6 million Jews were murdered by the Nazis, as well as the existence of gas chambers and extermination camps. Weber argued that Hitler did not have a “final solution” to annihilate European Jewry.

“The whole issue with The Nation underscores the very point that we live in a society in which trenchant criticisms of Jewish-Zionist power are just not permitted,” Weber said.

Medoff countered that it was important for respected publications to deny advertising space to the IHR and other groups that deny the Holocaust. “Groups like the IHR are always seeking legitimacy, to appear as if they are saying something credible,” Medoff said.

“If they place an ad in a mainstream publication, that’s a major victory in their view…. That’s why we felt it was important for The Nation to affirm that Holocaust denial is beyond the pale.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.