U.S. Groups Warn Israel On Failure To Pull Out

Zuckerman: Ties Could Sour

By Ori Nir

Published June 04, 2004, issue of June 04, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

WASHINGTON — American Jewish communal leaders are warning Prime Minister Sharon that a failure to implement his Gaza pullout plan could jeopardize Jerusalem’s relations with the Bush administration.

Sharon and members of his Cabinet received this blunt assessment last week from media mogul and real estate magnate Mortimer Zuckerman, the immediate past chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. Other prominent Jewish figures recently conveyed similar messages to the Sharon government, the Forward has learned.

“If the American president comes forth in the way that this president did, in support of an Israeli initiative, and then Israel cannot deliver, it is bound to have consequences for Israel’s relationship with the administration and with Congress,” Zuckerman said in an interview with the Forward. Zuckerman, the editor-in-chief of US News & World Report and the co-publisher of the New York Daily News, added: “They have to understand that they cannot take American support for granted.”

After meeting with the prime minister and other senior Israeli officials, Zuckerman gave an extensive interview to the Israeli daily Yediot Aharonot, stressing the importance of implementing Sharon’s plan, which includes the dismantling of all Jewish settlements in Gaza and four more in the West Bank. Zuckerman warned that a failure to implement the disengagement plan could lead to an internationally “imposed solution that Israel won’t be able to live with.”

Several Jewish communal leaders said that Zuckerman’s comments reflect the prevailing view among major Jewish organizations. It was “extremely important that someone of Zuckerman’s stature went public with it,” said a senior official with a Jewish organization, speaking on condition of anonymity. “You sometimes need someone like that to come out and say it.”

The decision to lobby Sharon rather than warn the White House against pressuring Israel appeared to reflect what Jewish communal leaders describe as their fundamental goal: the preservation of good relations between Jerusalem and Washington. The key to this calculation, they say, is the belief that President Bush currently sees Israel and America as partners engaged in the same war against terrorism. But now, Jewish communal leaders said, as the president is being heavily criticized on his policy in Iraq, bad news from Israel is only compounding America’s troubles in the Middle East.

Although pro-Israel activists in Washington insist they have not received explicit warnings from the administration, they say the White House is increasingly impatient, as well as disappointed, with Sharon and the Israeli political system. After a White House meeting April 14, Bush spoke out in support of Sharon’s plan and rewarded him with public assurances that Israel would not be expected to return to the pre-1967 borders or to resettle Palestinian refugees.

Since securing the guarantees from Bush, however, Sharon has seen his plan rejected by Likud voters in a May 2 referendum. He failed to win the support of his Cabinet.

Sharon’s bureau chief, Dov Weisglass, was in Washington on Tuesday to assure Bush’s national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, that the Israeli premier was still fully committed to implementing the plan in its entirety, Israeli diplomats said. Weisglass, they added, attempted to explain why Sharon was not able to bring his plan up for a vote at the Cabinet meeting Sunday. “It’s not an easy thing to explain, if I may say so,” Zuckerman said.

Rice reportedly told Weisglass that the President would support only the full plan — not a watered-down version, like the alternative proposals being suggested by several members of Sharon’s Cabinet.

Jewish communal leaders are concerned that Sharon’s inability to act swiftly and decisively to implement his plan, particularly at a time when America’s credibility in the Middle East is eroding, will be interpreted by the administration as a sign of disloyalty toward Bush. One organizational official said that at this turbulent time in the Middle East, “Sharon is losing an opportunity to be seen as a real partner to the president.” The official added: “If you can’t deliver, what kind of partner are you?”

A growing concern, both among pro-Israel activists in Washington and Israeli officials, is that a diplomatic vacuum created by Sharon’s failure to implement his plan would invite American and international pressure on Israel.

“It would be helpful for all concerned if the prime minister would heed Mort Zuckerman’s loving message,” said David Harris, the executive director of the American Jewish Committee. “If [Sharon’s] plan does not go forward, and it is not replaced by any other progress, the repercussions could be serious.”

The national director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman, also urged Sharon to get his plan passed, but expressed doubts that a failure to do so would severely harm American-Israel relations. Malcolm Hoenlein, the powerful executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents, which is the community’s main pro-Israel umbrella organization, declined to criticize Zuckerman’s remarks, saying only that not everyone agrees with his take.

Zuckerman said he was not carrying a message from Bush or from anyone else in the administration. “I was acting on my own,” he said, “based on my own knowledge of the politics of this country.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.