IN OTHER WORDS...

By Oren Rawls

Published October 10, 2003, issue of October 10, 2003.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Theological Iron Curtain: As former Vermont governor Howard Dean has ridden the wave of anti-Iraq war sentiment to the front of the Democratic presidential pack, pro-war party stalwarts have had a rough time carving a position palatable to liberals.

The increasingly bogged-down occupation of Iraq may, however, prove to be a boon to at least one stalled campaign for the Democratic nomination. Senator Joseph Lieberman, taken to task chiefly by Dean for his hawkish stance on the war against terrorism, is flashing his party bona fides — in the heart of Republican literary territory — by calling for more butter in America’s heretofore gun-heavy foreign policy toward the Muslim world.

“In a pattern emerging in postwar Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere, the United States takes forceful action to drain the swamps that breed terrorism, but fails to adequately seed the garden to enable peace, prosperity and democracy to take root and to prevent terrorism from returning,” the Connecticut senator writes in the fall issue of The National Interest, the neo-conservative answer to the journal Foreign Affairs. “Moderates are competing with extremists for control in the vacuum our military victories leave, with precious little support from the United States and its allies. Should the forces of fanaticism prevail in these postwar struggles, the theological iron curtain will undoubtedly descend, and behind it, terrorism will fester.”

Rhetorical flourishes aside, Lieberman proposes a “fundamental reassessment” of America’s Middle East policy. The backbone of his Arab policy is increased economic cooperation more closely aligned with “American values” than the regime-oriented policies of presidencies past and present. “Countries that prove themselves to be good global citizens,” he suggests, should be rewarded with trade preference programs.

But money alone, Lieberman warns, will not buy friendship with the Arab street. “In the Cold War, we understood that opening markets and opening minds go hand in hand,” he reminds readers. “We have to understand that now as well.”

The senator has quite a different picture of public diplomacy in mind than the Madison Avenue executive hired to sell the United States to the Muslim world after the September 11 terrorist attacks. Lieberman’s damage control begins with conveying to Muslim allies Washington’s extreme displeasure with the often-inflammatory messages emanating from state-run media and mosques in many Middle Eastern countries. He argues for cultivating local independent media sympathetic to the United States, rejuvenating foreign student-exchange programs and bolstering funding for the State Department presence overseas — a budget argument that may well come to haunt the Democratic senator if he moves his office from the Capitol to the White House.

For now, though, Lieberman is content crafting a centrist foreign policy, one that combines right-leaning strategic sensitivities with left-leaning diplomatic considerations.

“Over the long term,” he declares, “the fight for American security will require a parallel campaign to commend good by supporting freedom, tolerance, democracy and prosperity throughout the Muslim world. That is the best way to prevent a theological iron curtain from descending upon the Islamic world and suffocating the lives of millions of Muslims behind it and providing a base for terrorist attacks against us.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.