The Deadly Origins Of A Life-saving Procedure

Opinion

By Ruth Jolanda Weinberger

Published January 26, 2007, issue of January 26, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Every year in America, more than 3 million women undergo a colposcopy. Considered the gold standard for detecting cervical cancer in women with abnormal Pap smears, the procedure has saved an untold number of American lives. Indeed, in developing countries, where colposcopies are often unavailable, carcinoma of the cervix remains the leading cause of death by cancer.

This lifesaving procedure, however, had a far-from-benign beginning — one that ought to be brought to light as we commemorate the liberation of Auschwitz on January 27.

The inventor of the colposcope, Dr. Hans Hinselmann, was without a doubt a brilliant scientist. But he was also an active supporter of National Socialism, and there is strong evidence tying Hinselmann and his colposcope to the inhumane medical experiments conducted on Jewish women in Auschwitz. More than six decades after the closing of the concentration camp’s gates, it is finally time to set straight the historical record on Hinselmann.

He first described the colposcope in 1925, the same year he began working at the gynecological ward of the general hospital in Altona, a district in the northern German city of Hamburg. Just five years later, the ambitious doctor was named director of his own clinic, the Frauenklinik Altona, a position he would hold until the collapse of the Third Reich in 1945.

During its early stages of development, the colposcope was considered to be rather cumbersome. Indeed, it was mainly for this reason that the medical breakthrough was not put into practice in America until the 1950s. Aware of colposcopy’s shortcomings, Hinselmann continued to develop the procedure, in part by collaborating with his colleagues in the medical and scientific communities.

Among those colleagues was one of Hinselmann’s fellow doctors at the Frauenklinik Altona in Hamburg, Dr. Helmut Wirths. Wirths’s brother, Eduard, was the chief doctor of Auschwitz.

Nothing more than coincidence, some might argue; hardly grounds for tarnishing the legacy of a doctor whose invention has saved the lives of tens of millions of women over the years. And yet, inasmuch as it is possible to reconstruct events more than six decades after the fact, there appears to be enough circumstantial evidence to charge Hinselmann with at least passive knowledge of the horrifically cruel medical experiments conducted in Auschwitz.

The involvement in criminal medical experiments of Eduard Wirths has been documented by both postwar trials in Germany and the testimonies of survivors. The research he conducted in Auschwitz’s medical block, Block 10, focused on precancerous screenings of the cervix.

The primary procedure that Wirths employed? Hinselmann’s colposcopy.

Wirths himself was not particularly skilled with the procedure, so he delegated responsibility to an inmate doctor in Auschwitz named Maximillian Samuels. A German Jewish gynecologist and an expert in detecting precancerous growths in the cervix, Samuels was tasked with performing colposcopies on the female inmates in Block 10 and removing parts of their cervix. He was ordered to study precancerous conditions of the cervix and summarize his findings.

In the fall of 1943, Samuels completed his research and submitted to Wirths his report, titled “Carcinom: Die Geißel der Frauen der Welt Ist Heilbar” (“Carcinoma: The Female Scourge of This World Is Curable”). As soon as Samuels was finished, he was shot.

While his brother was busy in Auschwitz, Helmut Wirths worked with Hinselmann at the Frauenklinik Altona. Like Hinselmann, Wirths’s research focused on colposcopic examinations, and it was by none other than Hinselmann that Wirths was trained in the procedure.

That training was put to cruel use in 1943, when Wirths visited his brother in Auschwitz. Inmates who survived Block 10 have testified to the zeal with which Helmut Wirths immersed himself in the precancerous screenings conducted there. Some have even fingered him as the doctor responsible for initiating the often-lethal experiments.

And then there is this: During the years that Helmut Wirths worked in the Frauenklinik Altona, Eduard Wirths forwarded his histological results from Auschwitz to Hinselmann’s clinic. Indeed, as much was acknowledged by none other than the former chief doctor of Auschwitz himself, during interrogation shortly after the war.

Following the fall of the Third Reich, Hinselmann was found guilty by the Allies of having conducted forced sterilizations of Gypsy women at his gynecological clinic in Hamburg. But what about his knowledge of the medical experiments performed on Jewish women in Auschwitz’s Block 10, perhaps the greatest violation of the Hippocratic Oath in modern history? Should judgment not also be passed on his at least passive complicity in this most heinous of crimes?

Sixty-two years after the liberation of Auschwitz, the father of the colposcope remains a key figure in medical history, and for the untold number of lives he has saved he deserves credit. But for his complicity in the unbearable suffering inflicted on Jewish women in Auschwitz’s Block 10, Hinselmann deserves a qualified entry in the history books — and a moment of reflection from the millions of women in America who each year undergo a colposcopy.

Ruth Jolanda Weinberger, a scientific researcher at the Vienna-based Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Historical Social Science, is the author of a forthcoming book on fertility experiments conducted in Auschwitz-Birkenau.






Find us on Facebook!
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • "Mark your calendars: It was on Sunday, July 20, that the momentum turned against Israel." J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis on Israel's ground operation in Gaza:
  • What do you think?
  • "To everyone who is reading this article and saying, “Yes, but… Hamas,” I would ask you to just stop with the “buts.” Take a single moment and allow yourself to feel this tremendous loss. Lay down your arms and grieve for the children of Gaza."
  • Professor Dan Markel, 41 years old, was found shot and killed in his Tallahassee home on Friday. Jay Michaelson can't explain the death, just grieve for it.
  • Employees complained that the food they received to end the daily fast during the holy month of Ramadan was not enough (no non-kosher food is allowed in the plant). The next day, they were dismissed.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.