Agriprocessors’ Bi-Coastal Critics

Agriprocessors — the kosher meat giant that has been in the national spotlight ever since its Iowa slaughterhouse was the target of a massive federal immigration raid in May — is taking flak from critics east and west.

The Los Angeles Times and The Boston Globe both published editorials yesterday assailing Agriprocessors for its treatment of its workers. This time, however, the focus isn’t on allegations of mistreatment of workers at its Iowa plant (a story our Nathaniel Popper broke back in 2006).

Instead, the papers are unloading on Agri over its efforts to prevent workers at its Brooklyn distribution center from unionizing (another story Nathaniel broke for the Forward, this one just last month).

Both papers take aim at an attempt by Agriprocessors to void a 3-year-old vote in favor of unionization by its Brooklyn workers. The company has filed an appeal with the Supreme Court arguing that workers who are in the country illegally have no right to unionize, a position that, both papers note, flies in the face of a 1984 Supreme Court precedent.

The Times accuses Agriprocessors of “doing all it can to exploit every crack in the United States’ broken immigration system.”

Its editorialist writes:

The Globe for its part, in an editorial titled “More immigration chutzpah”, also manages to summon up a good measure of indignation:

Meanwhile, in other Agriprocessors news: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals keeps up its effort to draw attention to the company’s actions vis-à-vis the four-legged with another (gory) video, and Nathaniel Popper is interviewed about his Forward scoops by the new investigative journalism hub ProPublica.

Tagged as:

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Agriprocessors’ Bi-Coastal Critics

Thank you!

This article has been sent!

Close
Close