Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Israel News

5 Reasons Israelis Were Obsessed With the Hebron Shooter Trial

An Israeli military court convicted a 20-year-old soldier of manslaughter Wednesday in the fatal shooting of a subdued Palestinian, ending a saga that riveted the nation for nearly a year.

Why was this particular trial so gripping and polarizing in Israel?

Judges found Elor Azaria guilty of “needlessly” killing Abed al Fatah al Sharif as he lay incapacitated on the ground after attacking an Israeli soldier in March. The shooting was captured on video published by Israeli human rights group B’Tselem. The case broke open deep tensions in Israeli society over the conduct of the military in the Palestinian territories. Right-wing Israelis – including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — are now calling to pardon him.

Tehilla Shwartz Altshuler, the director of the Center for Democratic Values and Institutions at the Israel Democracy Institute, says there are five reasons:

1). Because it involved the army

With mandatory conscription for most Israeli men and women, the army is a “holy thing” in Israel, said Shwartz Altshuler. Many Israelis could identify with Azaria, and many parents could see themselves in his parents. Azaria’s supporters painted him as the son of the nation, who acted heroically to protect it. His detractors, meanwhile, called him a trained soldier who broke the law. Whether or not Israelis agreed with his act, Azaria’s case had great emotional pull because of the military connection.

2). Because it involved B’Tselem

Hawkish Israelis have painted B’Tselem as a treasonous organization that seeks to harm Israel by drawing international opprobrium onto the Jewish state. B’Tselem says it is upholding the rule of law in Israel. The anti-B’Tselem drumbeat has grown so loud in recent years that even lawmakers of the center-left Labor party have condemned the organization. This was not helped by B’Tselem director Hagai El-Ad addressing the UN on settlements last October. The fact that B’Tselem published the incriminating video of Azaria gave his supporters another reason to claim Azaria did no wrong.

3). Because it was heavily covered in the media

The Israeli media’s wall-to-wall coverage of the Azaria case, including the publication of the B’Tselem video, lead critics to say that the media was biased against Azaria from the get-go by blowing the incident out of proportion. Israel’s right-wing public and leaders — including Netanyahu – have long accused the Israeli media of liberal bias. In the Azaria case, the media was seen as attempting to paint Israel in “darker colors because they are lefties,” said Shwartz Altshuler.

4). Because political leaders weighed in

Israeli social media has been in an uproar over the Azaria case for months. Right-wing social media giants like rapper Yoav Eliasi, known as The Shadow, have been able to translate the online fury into on-the-street action like today’s hundreds-strong protest outside the Tel Aviv trial. Israeli politicians on the right understand that Azaria’s cause resonates with their base. That’s likely why Netanyahu, who at first denounced Azaria’s act, later made what many interpreted as a show of solidarity by phoning his parents, said Shwartz Altshuler. Many other right wing politicians have done the same.

5). Because it involved the Palestinians

Israeli policy toward the Palestinians is what divides the right from left, more than economic or social issues. Because the Azaria incident happened in Hebron, a flashpoint city in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, at the height of a slew of Palestinian attacks on Israelis, it has intense resonance among the Israeli public.

Contact Naomi Zeveloff at [email protected].

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.