Deserving a Vote

They deserve a vote. With that simple exhortation, President Obama cleverly married two causes that were certainly the emotional high points of his recent State of the Union address. In introducing his idea for a nonpartisan commission to “improve the voting experience in America,” he cited the hours-long wait some citizens endured last November just to cast a ballot. “We can fix this and we will,” he promised.

And when he pivoted to his proposals to reduce gun violence, he turned the voting imperative back to the House chamber, arguing that legislation to strengthen background checks and to ban assault weapons and massive ammunition magazines should be formally considered. “Gabby Giffords deserves a vote,” he said, as the applause rose. “The families of Newtown deserve a vote.” It didn’t take much more to bring most members of Congress to their feet.

Besides offering brilliant political theater, though, Obama was delivering an important message. Passage of gun safety laws and citizen engagement are linked; in fact, the first doesn’t have a prayer of happening without the second. Most Americans strongly favor his proposals, and most political analysts give them little chance of passing because of the supposed strength of the pro-gun lobby and the vagaries of congressional districting.

The only way ordinary citizens can overcome these obstacles is to summon the dedication of Desiline Victor, the 102-year-old Florida woman who waited in line for hours to vote in November’s general election. She deserved a vote. The majority who favor gun safety laws need to act like they deserve it, too.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Deserving a Vote

Thank you!

This article has been sent!

Close