Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Community

Is The Two State Solution Over? Thomas Friedman Says…Maybe.

A version of this piece originally appeared in Plus61J, an Australian Jewish publication.

If Israel and the Palestinians are to find peace, the initiative will have to come from them. They must own the process, or it will be doomed to fail, according to Thomas Friedman. “In the entire history of mankind, no-one ever washed a rented car,” the visiting US international affairs writer told a packed Emmanuel Synagogue at an NIF Australia event in Sydney last Saturday night.

In other words, a genuine peace can’t be imposed by the US or another honest broker, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author told ABC broadcaster, Geraldine Doogue.

On the subject of the U.S., he gave no credence to President Trump’s apparent optimism about the prospect of peace during his recent visit to Israel. While Trump may turn out to be the wild card that sparks some action by the parties, an X-factor so different from conventional politicians, Friedman was blunt about the US President’s comments: “I don’t see anything” – no evidence for optimism, and no confidence in Trump’s capacity to achieve a breakthrough.

In an ultimately pessimistic conclusion about the viability of a peace agreement, Friedman said the impasse is moving closer, every day – “whether by design or default” – from a two-state option to a one-state option. If that threshold is crossed, it will be a disaster for Israel and every Jewish community in the world, he argued.

“With two states, the debate is about right and left,” he explained, referring to percentages of land and degrees of accommodation. “With one state, it’s a debate about right and wrong, which will be much more divisive.”

Both peoples need their own homeland, a place to express their culture and identity, Friedman added. “Israelis will never feel at home and be able to take their shoes off unless Palestinians can, and vice-versa.”

When asked by Doogue whether the slide towards a point of no-return might be self-inflicted, Friedman laid the responsibility for the current inertia with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “Israel should not be getting out of the West Bank immediately, or without caution. But it should be testing whether it has a Palestinian partner for peace in the West Bank.

“Netanyahu is not interested in testing that. He is always dog-paddling in the Rubicon, never interested in crossing it. Why? Because he is a small man in a big time.”

Asked by the audience whether there was anyone, on either side of Israeli politics, who might be able to extend a hand for peace, Friedman said no names came to mind. Another question focussed on the existing division within the Palestinian leadership between Fatah and Hamas. Even if an Israeli leader did reach out, would the Palestinians be able to negotiate as a united partner? Friedman conceded that division would make the process harder, but said there was no acceptable alternative but to keep testing for peace.

Finally, someone from the audience put to him that most Israelis are happy with the status quo. Why would they want to change it if they are happy, and what would make them change?

The author did not have a ready answer. “Perhaps a major explosion,” he said, referring to either a physical or a political event. “Otherwise, the status quo will continue – until it doesn’t.” While his pragmatism was eloquent, the moral implication of his observations was left unexamined.

If Israelis are happy for the status quo to continue, are they also happy for the occupation of the Palestinian territories to continue, and with it the diminished rights and opportunities that Palestinians must endure?

As they say in cricket, that was a question that this conversation let go straight through to the keeper.

Watch selected clips from the event here.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we need 500 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Our Goal: 500 gifts during our Passover Pledge Drive!

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.