Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.

Bintel BriefYour turn: Readers respond to Bintel advice on blackface photo from 40 years ago

‘It was 40 years ago in another world,’ said one reader. ‘Forgive if there is true regret,’ said another

A recent Bintel column and podcast episode generated thoughtful responses from several readers. So this week, instead of our usual Q&A format, we’re sharing excerpts of those responses. Need advice? Send your dilemma to bintel@forward.com.

Chief Egregious Offense Officer” recently wrote to Bintel wondering what to do about a photo that turned up showing a white employee dressed as Michael Jackson in blackface at a Halloween party 40 years ago. The advice-seeker was the white person’s boss — actually the organization’s CEO — who noted that the person was an otherwise outstanding employee.

Our Bintel podcast hosts, Ginna Green and Lynn Harris, said there was no statute of limitations on something as offensive as blackface, and suggested talking to the employee about racism, “to be assured that they’re not merely embarrassed, but that they understand the seriousness of their bad judgment and the harm it caused, even if indirect.” (Read their full response or listen to the podcast episode.)

“Sometimes people get a pass because it was 40 years ago and they’ve learned, but sometimes people have to take the fall for generations of harm,” they wrote, “because the only way we change culture and ensure that these things are never OK is to hold people accountable.”

Here’s what readers said, lightly edited for length and clarity.

If there’s regret, then forgive

David Burger wrote in to encourage the boss to talk to the offender privately and find out whether he had done teshuva — repentance and amends. If he has, Burger asked, “is it right to publicly embarrass that person?”

“There is a principle in Jewish ethics that states that humiliating a person is akin to killing him or her. Do you really think it’s worth taking that chance?” he added. “I hope you’d find it in your heart to forgive if there is true regret. We all have done things we wish we hadn’t in the past, at least if we have a conscience.”

Minstrelsy or tribute?

Another reader, Bob Schwartz, said that he sees a difference between “a white performer in blackface doing generic repugnant minstrelsy, and a white person’s live portrayal of a particular Black performer idolized by audiences of all races and colors, all over the world.” 

If you’re doing Elvis, you need “the right hair and the right outfits,” Schwartz said, adding that he’s a fan of Billy Crystal’s Sammy Davis Jr. impression and Eddie Murphy’s Old Jewish Man character in “Coming To America.” 

“Brilliant, yes,” wrote Schwartz. “Offensive, I don’t think so.”

What’s acceptable now won’t be in the future

Leonard Krubner also posited that the offender was “likely a big Michael Jackson fan” who should get a pass on an incident that took place four decades ago.

I hope that whoever wrote that response is clear on one thing: they are currently engaging in one or more types of behavior, right now, at this moment, that will be condemned as utterly unacceptable in 40 years,” Krubner wrote. “It could be the fact that they’re using a plastic water bottle, or eating meat, or even just using their iPhone (built with slave labor in the authoritarian regime of China). 

“A photo might surface in 40 years of this columnist sitting in a steakhouse in 2022, and their CEO in the future might be under pressure to fire them as a result (meat consumption, of course, being an unforgivable sin against the environment at that future date). Should they be judged decades from this moment for behavior that the overwhelmingly vast majority of their peers currently have no issue with? Of course not! Yet that sort of wisdom, perspective, and compassion is utterly lacking from the Bintel Brief column in question.”

‘Hope they’ve learnt something’

On Twitter, a user named @misstravels said: It was 40 years ago, in another world. I don’t think it’s worth bringing it up. They’re either very old now or were very young then; we hope they’ve learnt something.”

We’re always eager to hear your feedback — and your quandaries about life, love, family, friends or work. Email us or message us via Twitter. Listen to the Bintel Brief podcast here.

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version