Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Fast Forward

Neo-Nazis Think Killing Net Neutrality Will Be Good For Them

Neo-Nazis think that the current government proposal to end net neutrality, sometimes called the “First Amendment of the internet,” will be to their benefit.

Net neutrality means that web service providers like Comcast or Time Warner must treat and charge all websites the same regardless of content. The Federal Communications Commission is weighing whether to end that mandate.

Many prominent websites devoted to Nazi ideology and white supremacy have gone dark over the past year. Their domain providers have removed sites like the Daily Stormer from the internet, forcing them to go on the so-called “dark web.” Some neo-Nazis, like the Daily Stormer’s founder Andrew Anglin, believe that killing net neutrality laws would help put their sites back online.

“It will be a transformative thing, and it will unleash a plague of frogs on Twitter at full force again,” Anglin wrote on the Daily Stormer. “The cavalry is coming, my friends, and it is coming to do something about these kikes.”

Andrew Auernheimer, a prominent neo-Nazi hacker, posted a YouTube video also criticizing net neutrality, saying that it helps maintain the telecom companies’ monopolies. “Businesses should be allowed to run their business how they please, and the Jewish-run FCC should not have the right to muscle them out of business with tyrannical policies,” he wrote in 2010.

Experts believe that this view is misguided.

“If the alt-right movement thinks doing away with net neutrality laws will help them stay online, they are in for a big surprise,” Ryan Singel, a fellow at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School in California, told Newsweek.

Repealing net neutrality will make it easier for corporations to resist hosting racist or anti-Semitic content, he said: “The exact opposite thing of what these people want is what they’re going to get.”

Contact Ari Feldman at feldman@forward.com or on Twitter @aefeldman

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version