Schakowsky’s Israel Question
EVANSTON, ILL. — Democratic U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky was ebullient Tuesday night, sharing a beer with cheering supporters at her re-election victory party at a local restaurant. But Schakowsky’s revelry was interrupted by a reporter asking about her opponent’s efforts to make an issue of her support for the Obama administration’s Israel policy.
“This was an effort to try to pander to Jewish donors, voters, to split off the Jews,” she said. “Of all the things that happened in this campaign, this is the one that I really want to sort out.
“Is this a trend? Is Israel going to become a political football?”
Schakowsky won her race by a comfortable margin — 66 percent to 34 percent — in a self-described “progressive district” that spans Chicago’s North Side as well as suburban Skokie, Evanston, Wilmette and several other towns. She has good ties with both AIPAC and J-Street — the mainstream and dovish Israel lobbies, respectively — and describes herself as “100 percent pro Israel.” But her opponent, Tea Party Republican Joel Pollak, cut into Schakowsky’s vote, particularly in Orthodox and Haredi communities.
Recalling one debate with Pollak at an Orthodox synagogue in Chicago’s West Rogers Park neighborhood, Schakowsky said she was disturbed both by her opponent’s tone and content.
“It was the oddest feeling, that somehow I was in an enemy camp. It was really unsettling. He was saying some really awful things. I mean, I went to Zionist camp as a kid.”
Her own seat seems safe for the time being. But Schakowsky was visibly worried by the prospect of the Obama administration’s Israel policy becoming a wider issue. She was particularly stunned to hear of the loss of Miami Congressman Ron Klein, whose non-Jewish opponent criticized Klein’s support for Obama’s Israel policy.
Asked if she might talk to the Obama administration about changing course, Schakowsky paused, then indicated that the Jewish caucus would have to consider it:
“We have to understand this a little better — how this went. It’s a fair discussion we should have,” the congresswoman said. “There was so much opportunism involved in this, versus real concern for Israel.”
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
