Congress: Still Opposed to a Palestinian Statehood Declaration
By Nathan Guttman December 16, 2010
Congress is heading into the last days of its lame duck session and the agenda is packed with major legislation to deal with — but there’s always time to slip in a pro-Israel resolution before legislators leave the city.
The resolution, H. Res-1734, which passed Wednesday without a vote, is a response to what Israel and the U.S. administration view as a rapidly growing threat — the possible unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state. Recent decisions by Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay to recognize Palestinian statehood helped drive home the message that such a declaration could be imminent, if peace talks fail.
The driving force behind the resolution is California Rep. Howard Berman, the outgoing chairman of the House Foreign Affairs committee, who pushed the resolution through the committee and to the floor at lightning speed. On board was an impressive bipartisan slate, representing the strong base of support pro-Israel resolutions automatically enjoy in Congress.
The resolution states that Congress “reaffirms its strong opposition to any attempt to establish a Palestinian state outside the negotiating process” and calls on the administration to actively oppose any attempt to declare a Palestinian state through the United Nations.
The resolution is non-binding and does not carry any practical significance. It does, however, send a strong signal to the administration that Congress expects it to take action in international bodies to block attempts to declare a Palestinian state unilaterally.
Jewish groups had been pushing the White House for several months to make clear it will veto a resolution declaring a Palestinian state if it reaches the UN Security Council.
It is not clear however that pressure is needed. In her December 10 speech at the Saban Forum, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated: “Unilateral efforts at the United Nations are not helpful and undermine trust.” Administration officials have stressed this point many times.
For Jewish groups, the Berman resolution served as a great opportunity to rally the base. AIPAC called on its supporters to urge their representatives to support the resolution. On the other end of the Jewish political map, Americans for Peace Now sent out letters to House staffers arguing that the Berman resolution is incomplete since it lacks any reference to Israeli unilateral actions such as settlement expansion. APN did not take a position for against the resolution. J Street took a similar approach and said the resolution “continues a pattern in which overly one-sided resolutions are introduced and moved to the floor of the House without an adequate opportunity for debate, discussion and modification by the Members.”
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
