Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
News

Disputed Practice Persists at Iowa Plant

Practices at the glatt kosher Iowa slaughterhouse once home to the scandal-ridden Agriprocessors meatpacking firm are improving, observers and plant operators say. But some techniques employed at the plant continue to draw criticism from activists.

Agriprocessors, once the country’s largest kosher slaughter operation, went bankrupt in the wake of a 2008 immigration raid at its Postville, Iowa plant. It was, at the time, the largest such raid in the nation’s history. Previous investigations had uncovered significant animal welfare and worker-safety issues there.

Then, in 2009, the plant was bought by another firm and reopened under the name Agri Star. The new firm undertook significant reforms at the plant. But the slaughterhouse continues to use a high-tech pen to flip cattle upside down before they are killed. It’s a practice animal welfare experts deem acceptable, if not ideal. But activists with groups such as People for Ethical Treatment of Animals decry the practice as unnecessarily cruel.

“We prefer to do standing shechita,” said Menachem Genack, rabbinic administrator of the Orthodox Union’s kosher division, referring to the upright pen method of slaughter that is considered the humane gold standard. But the O.U., which certifies Agri Star, continues to allow the firm to use the inverting pens.

The Agri Star plant has acceded to a number of animal welfare suggestions made in 2009 and 2010 by PETA, the animal rights group that first exposed some of the abuses taking place at the plant under Agriprocessors. In response to questions submitted by the Forward, Agri Star said in a statement that it had retained an external animal welfare consultant who sends inspectors on unannounced weekly audits of the plant.

Agri Star declined the Forward’s request to speak with the animal welfare consultant, Erika Voogd, citing the confidential nature of the information the firm shares with her.

In its statement, Agri Star wrote that so-called “vibrating prods” were now used as a more humane alternative to electric prods to move cattle into the plant in most cases.

The statement also said that the plant now stuns animals that do not die immediately after slaughter. According to PETA, the plant previously used a rifle to shoot animals that remained conscious after their throats were cut. But workers needed permission to use the rifle, and getting that permission took too long to make the practice effective in reducing suffering, critics said.

Though these are seen as positive steps, Agri Star also continues to use a rotating pen that inverts the cattle for slaughter. The pen is considered a more humane alternative to the previous method, known as shackle and hoist, which subjected the animals to just those actions. But the rotating pen method is also controversial.

“In the big picture, a well-operated upside-down pen is a lot better than a poorly operated upright pen,” said Joe Mac Regenstein, a professor at Cornell University’s Department of Food Science. Comparing a well-operated upright pen with a well-operated upside-down pen, Regenstein said that an upright pen is “clearly better, but not by enough that it’s worth fighting the fervently Orthodox rabbis.”

Hannah Schein, PETA’s manager of undercover operations, said that Agri Star had led PETA to believe that the plant was no longer using the inverting pen. When informed by the Forward that it is still doing so, Schein issued a statement condemning the practice, and condemning the O.U. for continuing to allow it.

“Flipping cattle upside down violates the prohibition of tsa’ar ba’alei chayim — causing unnecessary suffering to animals — and defies the humane kosher slaughter recommendations of renowned animal welfare experts such as Dr. Temple Grandin,” Schein wrote.

Agri Star defended its practices. “We are confident that the steps we have taken significantly improved the conditions in our facility,” the company said in its statement.

Contact Josh Nathan-Kazis at nathankazis@forward.com or on Twitter @joshnathankazi

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version