Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Why Did Airplane Passengers Ignore Chabad Woman’s Warning?

Have you ever been discriminated against because of how you were dressed? Or how about because of the way you spoke?

Mussie Weinfeld very well might have been.

have surfaced that a 22-year-old Chabad woman may or may not have saved an entire airplane full of people set to fly from Ben Gurion to Moscow when she heard abnormal sounds coming from the wing of the plane during takeoff and insisted that the airline, TransAero, check the mechanics of the plane. Initially she was laughed at by flight attendants and scoffing fellow passengers, but her persistence, the news article claims, got them to check the plane.

The airline’s narrative conflicts with the one reported on Crown Height Info, an unofficial news source for the Chabad Hasidic sect, saying that, in fact, the issue was already being investigated when the Orthodox woman pointed out the noise.

Whether or not the facts of the story as initially reported are correct, we can learn from it some very interesting things about credibility. It’s no secret that the Orthodox Jewish population is often the subject of discrimination. It’s also no secret that, in many parts of the world, women are still taken less seriously than men. Fall into both of those subsets simultaneously — you’re an Orthodox Jew and a woman — and the threshold you have to reach to be deemed credible is immediately raised.

But why is that? Why was Mussie Weinfeld’s concern about the malfunctioning wing initially disregarded? Is it because she looked different? Sounded different? What is the nature of the prejudice against Orthodox Jewish women?

As a Modern Orthodox woman, even though I always tried to be mildly trendy, my elbows, knees, and collarbone were always covered in accordance with Jewish law. Regardless of how cool I looked inside my Orthodox bubble (which, let’s be honest, wasn’t even that cool), in secular settings I always looked oddly out of place.

I remember one especially uncomfortable experience at an airport in southern Spain. I was on my way home from visiting my family in the area. I was dressed in a then-trendy hot pink, three-quarter sleeve polo shirt, A-line denim skirt that fell somewhere between my knees and my ankles (cringe!), and gold ballet flats. In the hot, humid Andalucían climate, I was clearly not dressed seasonally.

Once I was through security, a chatty Andalucían woman stopped me, and, in typical Spanish style, started babbling about how hot it was outside, and how could I possible be so covered up in this weather, and how beautiful I was etc. I answered her calmly in her mother tongue, laughing, thanking her, and explaining that I dress this way because of religion. That led to an interesting conversation about religion and modernity, the nuance of which I couldn’t quite convey in Spanish. She nodded at me patronizingly, but I realized she didn’t understand what I was trying to say. I think she walked away thinking I was loon.

As I was chatting with this quintessential Spaniard, I realized the vital importance of having a good grasp on language. Without it, it’s nearly impossible to convey ideas. Sure, it’s possible to make yourself generally understood, but to truly convey what you’re trying to say you need language — the ultimate marker of credibility.

Truth be told, the way I dressed never really impeded my credibility. Only my language — or lack thereof — has.

Philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein wrote, “the limits of my language are the limits of my world.” Though Wittgenstein meant this from a semiotics framework, from a practical standpoint, this could mean that if you are unable to express a thought, you are sure to bump up against a personal limit. If, for example, you’re in a foreign country and don’t know a single word of the national language — well, good luck.

This also holds true for credibility. If you can eloquently and clearly enunciate a problem, request, or anything else, then you are far more likely to be understood. Chances are that Mussie Weinfeld, a Crown Heights Jew, didn’t speak Russian, the lingua franca on the TransAero flight, and that her Hebrew was heavily accented. As such, she probably couldn’t convey to the satisfaction of her listeners what she was trying to say about the plane. Instead of trying to understand her, people just laughed it off.

The fact that Weinfeld was initially laughed at, therefore, may not have been because of her clearly Orthodox Jewish outfit at all. It may have been because of her accent and her lack of language — and that is a problem in and of itself. There are large populations of ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities that do not learn to speak grammatically correct English or modern Hebrew. That is extremely damaging. Even if they try to stay within their own communities, they’ll come into contact with other populations eventually — even if just on a TransAero flight from Ben Gurion to Moscow to New York.

Language is so vital in the Torah. Rabbinic interpretations of narrative and law are completely based on linguistic deviations and shifts. How could one be an Orthodox Jew without a deep-seated appreciation for all language?

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version