Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Joe Biden Needs To Apologize

The ongoing scandal over Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court brings back echoes of the shameful treatment of Anita Hill during her 1991 testimony at the confirmation hearings for Clarence Thomas. The parallels between the two hearings are a litmus test for how much Washington has progressed in the intervening twenty-seven years.

The biggest disappointment thus far has been Joe Biden, who chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee when Hill testified. Today, with the benefit of nearly three decades of hindsight, the best Biden could do was say that Hill was “vilified” and that “I wish I could’ve done more to prevent those questions, the way they asked them.”

“I wish I could’ve done more,” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that statement.

Lest we forget, Hill wasn’t just vilified during her testimony; the woman was subjected to a prolonged and brutal campaign aimed to punish her, a campaign best encapsulated by professional smear artist David Brock’s catchy quip about Hill being “a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty.”

Twenty-seven years later, Biden’s efforts at assembling an apology to Hill can best be described as a little bit trying, and a little bit lying.

Biden’s implication that he had done all he could’ve done for Hill is simply untrue. His failure has been exhaustively covered, with the most damning evidence being his decision to not call three additional witnesses who were prepared to corroborate Hill’s assertions about Thomas’ harassment of women. Investigative journalists Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson wrote a book about it, Strange Justice: the Selling of Clarence Thomas, which was a National Book Award finalist.

Biden could’ve done better. He should’ve done better. By implying that he had done all he could for Hill, he’s demonstrating a refusal to accept responsibility, along with a generous dose of historical revisionism.

These are also the go-to defenses of the Donald Trump White House.

It may seem unfair to focus on Biden, who drafted the Violence Against Women Act, spoke eloquently on behalf of the victim of Brock Turner’s Stanford rape, and had long been seen as a champion of women. Biden’s certainly far from being the worst threat to women, and appears to genuinely support women’s rights.

But that’s precisely why his actions here matter.

The seminal moment in most social justice movements comes not from far left progressives, not from conservatives, but from the center left, the ones who are generally supportive, but may not be willing to put themselves out there for a cause.

Feminists don’t need to shift; they’re already in the vanguard of women’s rights. And no one expects Trump and his supporters to have an epiphany. But Biden, who’s perfectly positioned between the Thomas and Kavanaugh hearings, can have immense impact, by rising to the occasion and doing what Hill insists he has never done before: saying sorry.

It’s an extraordinary opportunity for a bit of reconciliation at a moment when the country sure could use it.

For the past three years, it feels as if America had turned itself into a stifling crockpot, with endless accusations, counter accusations, sick burns and whatabouts stewing and swirling with each turn of the news cycle.

Biden could crack open a little ventilation window simply by apologizing to Hill without tossing in disingenuous addenda.

It’d be on brand, too: Biden’s long been portrayed as a simple, decent guy. “I’m sorry, I should’ve done more,” sure seems like a simple, decent thing to say.

Lev Golinkin is the author of “A Backpack, a Bear, and Eight Crates of Vodka.”

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version