Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

I’m glad Jonathan Pollard is moving to Israel. He doesn’t belong here.

Growing up in the fairly right-wing Orthodox community of Midwood, Brooklyn, during the immediate post-9/11 era, there were a number of active political causes that did not sound quite right to my young self. Through that potent combination of intellectual curiosity and adolescent rebellion, I began to define myself as a liberal, a rather dirty word in some parts of the country during the mid-aughts. For several months in 8th grade, I wore an orange ribbon from the American Civil Liberties Union to show my support for closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay; my poor rebbe thought I was identifying with Gush Katif.

But there was only one communal cause I can remember that I not only disagreed with, but made me feel actively uncomfortable as a Jewish child in America: They were the periodic campaigns to free the convicted spy Jonathan Pollard, whose parole conditions expired on Friday, allowing him to move to Israel.

The cause felt wrong to me even before I learned the dirty details that unsurprisingly never made it into the messages disgracefully calling him a “Prisoner of Zion” — details like Pollard’s megalomania, his cocaine use, the offer to spy for Pakistan’s intelligence agency before Pollard turned to Israel, the sheer damage done to American intelligence capabilities. I felt that Pollard was no hero but a millstone bearing down on the necks of American Jews still dogged by the antisemitic accusation of “dual loyalty.”

Even if it was true that Pollard received a disproportionately harsh sentence, which he did, I thought his was a struggle that should not be taken up. He betrayed his country, and by doing so, he betrayed American Jews.

I would not have objected to the U.S. government releasing him from prison early, as the conservative writer Bret Stephens did in an acerbic and controversial 2013 column. But I was determined not to lift my finger an inch for him. If there was no higher honor for an American Jew than to honorably serve their home country, then Pollard’s perfidy was an embarrassment — even a heavy burden — for American Jews who aspired to join the U.S. defense or intelligence communities, as it was for people who wanted to legitimately advocate for Israel, then and now an American ally.

Unlike Dreyfus, Pollard was not a victim of a libel. He was guilty as charged. And while it’s true that antisemites who allege dual loyalty are responsible for the hatred and suspicion they produce, as well as for the harm they do to their victims, it is impossible for me not to believe that Pollard shoulders at least some responsibility for the endurance of the dual loyalty myth in America.

Perhaps most maddening of all, Pollard had the potential to be an exemplary citizen, someone we could’ve been proud of. He was born into a prosperous American family; his father was a microbiologist at Notre Dame. And he passed through America’s most august institutions, including Stanford University and U.S. Naval Intelligence. By almost all accounts, Pollard is a brilliant man.

In an alternative universe where Pollard received the mental health care he so obviously needed early on in his life, one could imagine him rising to become the first Jewish director of the CIA. Or, if he was truly committed to living the Zionist dream, he could have made aliya and served Israel in an honest capacity that did not harm his community, as many American Jews have done and still do.

Instead, we live in this universe, the one where Jonathan Jay Pollard sold us out for drug money.

Still, despite the anger I felt toward him and still feel, I am happy Pollard will now be allowed to relocate to Israel. It is clear the intelligence Pollard collected is either no longer relevant or no longer secret, and I do not believe in lifelong punishments.

After 33 years, he should be allowed to move on.

But most of all, I am happy Pollard will not be in the U.S. He does not belong here.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version