Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Chuck Hagel’s Jewish Scorecard

The debate over the possible nomination of former Senator Chuck Hagel for defense secretary is not dying down.

The White House has yet to formally announce whether Hagel will be its pick for the top Pentagon post, although President Obama has signalled to insiders that he is the likely choice. And the president did come out in Hagel’s defense in his Sunday Meet the Press interview, calling the Nebraska Republican “a patriot”.

Where does the Jewish community stand on Hagel as Defense Secretary? All over the map.

Leading the detractors is, of course, Abraham Foxman of the Anti Defamation League whose remark that Hagel’s comments on the pro-Israel lobby “border on anti-Semitism” triggered the entire debate. The American Jewish Committee’s David Harris weighed in on the same side with an anecdote reminding the public of Hagel’s refusal to sign a letter condemning anti Semitism in Russia. Malcolm Hoenlein of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations expressed “concern” over the possibility that Hagel will take over as defense secretary, although he did add that such a nomination will be something “we will work with.”

The Republican Jewish Coalition was first to criticize Hagel, calling his nomination “a slap in the face for every American who is concerned about the safety of Israel.”

The Israel Project’s new president and CEO Josh Block has also been active in circulating material highlighting opposition to Hagel due to his record on Israel.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee has not made any public statement regarding its views on Hagel although it is widely believed that the pro-Israel lobby would not be at ease with a defense secretary who has openly criticized it.

Among the few Jewish groups standing up for Hagel are the dovish lobby J Street as well as Americans for Peace Now. The National Jewish Democratic Council did not express any view on the issue.

In Congress, some Jewish lawmakers chose to steer clear. New York Senator Chuck Schumer refused to take a stand on the issue, while Senator Dianne Feinstein said Hagel was “confirmable meaning he could get approved by Senate. Michigan’s Carl Levin, who heads the Senate’s armed services committee which will lead the confirmation expressed his support for Hagel. Independent Joe Lieberman, who ended his Senate career on Wednesday, said he would have some “serious questions” for Hagel and estimated that his confirmation would be “tough”.

In the House, retiring Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank stated his opposition to the nomination because of Hagel being “against fairness for LGBT people” and New York’s Eliot Engel, the incoming ranking Democrat on the House foreign affairs committee said he is concerned about the nomination.

In the world of pundits, it was the New York Times’ Thomas Friedman who set the tone for the debate by urging all parties to “give Chuck a chance”. On the other end of the spectrum it was the Weekly Standard’s William Kristol who not only led the attack against Hagel but also ran ads through the Emergency Committee on Israel he founded arguing that Hagel is “not a responsible option” for the job.

So, Hagel’s bottom line with the Jewish community is surprisingly mixed. While he clearly does not enjoy much support from the organized Jewish world, he still has backing, albeit not very vocal, from some leading Jewish senators. And he’ll always have Tom Friedman.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we need 500 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Our Goal: 500 gifts during our Passover Pledge Drive!

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.