Why Didn’t the Palestinians Get Their State Before 1967?
In your November 19 editorial “Whose Jerusalem?” you accurately point out that, from 1948 to 1967, much of East Jerusalem was part of the “West Bank.” However, the editorial draws the wrong conclusion from this important piece of history.
In 1947, U.N. Resolution 181 created not only a Jewish state out of the British Mandate, but also an independent Arab state. And after the 1948 war, East Jerusalem was also under Arab control.
If the creation of an independent Palestinian state with a capital in Jerusalem is so critical today, why wasn’t this accomplished when the West Bank and East Jerusalem were all under Arab control prior to 1967? Why would there need to be another war in 1967?
The future status of Jerusalem is certainly an incredibly complex issue, but the puzzle will never be solved unless we all remember our modern history lessons and learn from them.
David E. Cohen
Wyckoff, N.J.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
