Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
The Schmooze

Amy Schumer and Lena Dunham Speak Up About ‘Glamour’s’ Plus-Size Issue

Amy Schumer was surprised to see herself in a plus-size issue of Glamour magazine.

@GlamourMag partnered with @LaneBryant to give you a special issue dedicated to your curves! Pick up a copy today!! ?? #chicatanysize #beautybeyondsize

A photo posted by A S H L E Y G R A H A M (@theashleygraham) on

The actress and comedienne claimed she was never asked to appear in the issue. But more than that, she was perplexed at having been labeled “plus-sized.”

“Plus size is considered size 16 in America. I go between a size 6 and an 8,” she wrote.

While Amy Schumer said there is nothing wrong with being plus size in her post, she wondered whether girls looking at her body and thinking it was plus-sized wasn’t harmful for their self image. “Not cool glamour, not glamourous,” she ended her post.

On Twitter and Instagram, Schumer asked readers for their opinions, and they come in heavy supply.

Other celebrities also offered their opinions. , at an event for “The Hollywood Reporter” was asked for her opinion about the controversy.

“I think Amy’s entire thing is trying to sort of like break down barriers and be bold about her own opinions,” Dunham said, “And what I think she was trying to do was stand up for women and say we’re not supposed be categorized in this role, we’re supposed to just be allowed to exist.”

Melissa McCarthy, who is also in the Glamour plus-size issue, posted cheered Schumer on her Instagram, and ended her message of support with a quote from Gloria Steinem:

And while Glamour has since apologized to Schumer, the whole controversy did make them seen… Less than glamorous.

Schumer joining the important conversation on body image and the arbitrary and harmful classification of women based on their dress sizes, though, was more than enough to make up for it. And she ended the night with a very glamorous video of her flying a kite in a bikini.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version