Suicide and Fashion Just Don’t Mix
Suicide should never be in fashion, and it should also never be in a fashion spread.
In case you missed it last week, the online media community was abuzz about a fashion photo spread called “Last Words” in Vice’s 2013 Fiction Issue. The editors decided that in the issue—devoted entirely to female writers, photographers, illustrators and other contributors—there should be a fashion feature showing famous women writers in the process of killing themselves.
Following an onslaught of outrage from the public, Vice decided to pull the piece—but not before Jezebel ran the photos of models posing as Virginia Woolf (about to drown herself), historian Iris Chang (gun to her mouth), Dorothy Parker (slitting her wrists; she attempted suicide more than once, but did not die from it), Charlotte Perkins Gilman (with a chloroform-soaked hanky over her mouth), Taiwanese novelist Sanmao (noose around her neck), Beat poet Elise Cowen (splat on the pavement), and of course, Sylvia Plath (kneeling in front of an open oven door).
Response pieces in Jezebel, Slate and other publications point out that while Vice listed each writer’s name, dates of birth and death, and cause of death, it made no mention of the women’s works. However, a lot of copy was devoted to the fashion merchandise worn during the “suicides.” The height of the tastelessness was a fashion credit for the tights used for the model Sanmao’s noose. “Just in case you want to go buy the same ones, I guess?” Jezebel supposed.
In general, we need to see less violence against women portrayed in the media, and in particular, we certainly don’t need to see violence women do to themselves—especially when it stems from mental instability and emotional anguish. That’s not to say that suicide should be swept under the rug. On the contrary, with suicide on the rise in the overall population (more people die this way than in car crashes) and among members of the military, suicide prevention needs to be high on the public agenda.
But there is a huge difference between approaching suicide concerns as a public health issue and hijacking them for commercial purposes. There is no reason why young people (those toward whom the fashion spread was presumably aimed) should not discuss these writers’ suicides. However, the question all of us should be asking is “Why did they do it?” not “What were they wearing?”
No matter how you dress it up, suicide is something ugly we have to look at—with our hearts and minds, and not with an eye to sartorial style.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.
In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.
At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.
Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30