E.U. Slams Israel, But Summit Finds Common Ground
Fresh on the heels of its first ever mandate to station monitors at the border crossing between Gaza and Egypt, the European Union is trying to reassert itself into the Israeli-Palestinian process.
So far, the push is producing mixed results.
First the E.U. came under fire from Israel last week over a leaked internal report criticizing Israel’s policies in East Jerusalem. Then, later in the week, E.U. leaders were forced to go to the wire to salvage a summit meeting with Mediterranean countries in Barcelona marked by Israeli-Arab wrangling and the absence of heads of states from the Middle East.
The flaps come just weeks after U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice brokered a deal between Israeli and Palestinian officials that calls for E.U. forces to monitor the Rafah border crossing in coordination with Israel. This is the first time that the E.U. will have “boots on the ground” as a neutral third party in territories. But Israeli officials, who had expressed reluctance at the new European role, were quick to blast the E.U. after a New York Times report detailed E.U. criticism of Israel’s policies in East Jerusalem.
According to the Times, the E.U.’s diplomatic representatives in East Jerusalem and Ramallah claimed in a draft report prepared for E.U. foreign ministers that Israel’s actions in East Jerusalem “are reducing the possibility of reaching a final-status agreement on Jerusalem that any Palestinian could accept.” In its report, the E.U. representatives urged European leaders to take more aggressive steps to challenge Israeli policies in East Jerusalem.
European officials stressed that the report was not final and that it merely was aimed at providing guidance to top decision-makers.
In Barcelona, the prestige of the “Euro-Mediterranean” summit was tarnished by the absence of the majority of Middle Eastern leaders. While most E.U. heads of state attended, the only top Middle Eastern leaders to make the trip were Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Lower-ranking officials represented other Middle Eastern nations. Israel sent its finance minister, Ehud Olmert.
Divisions over the Middle East peace process forced European leaders to drop a formal “common vision” statement on revamping relations with their southern neighbors by linking aid more directly to democratic, economic and political reforms.
Israel objected to part of the draft summary referring to the “road map” and in particular to a paragraph linking the plan — sponsored by the E.U., the United Nations, the United States and Russia — to the 2002 declaration of the Arab League summit that was based on a Saudi peace plan. Jerusalem only agreed to a general mention of the road map and support for a two-state solution.
Israel also scored a diplomatic victory when E.U. leaders, desperate to produce a concrete achievement, rammed through an anti-terrorism “code of conduct” by strongarming Arab countries during feverish and protracted negotiations. In an indication of the climate at the summit, Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Zapatero and a senior aide were caught on a microphone discussing the urgent need to come up with a deal before the end of the gathering.
In the end, the 35 countries endorsed a code of conduct that denounces terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. Officials were quick to paint the text as a model for long-stalled negotiations at the U.N. to define terrorism and enact a dozen conventions on terrorism.
The E.U. and Israel resisted an Arab push to effectively exempt attacks by those “under foreign occupation” from the definition of terrorism, a term used by Arab nations at the U.N. to refer to Israeli rule in the Palestinian territories that also could be applied by some nations to America’s presence in Iraq.
The code states that “terrorist attacks cannot be justified or legitimized by any cause or grievance.”
British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the summit’s host, hailed the agreement as “a very significant step forward.”
“I think this is very important both for the European countries, but also for our other colleagues around the table,” Blair said during a press conference. “It’s as strong a statement as you can possibly have on the unified determination to fight terrorism in all its forms.”
Speaking in Berlin, E.U. Justice Commissioner Franco Frattini said the document could trigger a breakthrough in U.N. efforts to agree on a definition of terrorism and a code of conduct for governments worldwide.
Among other things, the code requires the E.U., Israel and its neighbors to attempt to “prevent terrorists accessing money and weapons, to disrupt their plans and disrupt their networks and to bring them to justice by strengthening international cooperation.”
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news. All donations are still being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000 until April 24.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
