Skip To Content
Back to Opinion

After yet another health crisis, why can’t Sen. Dianne Feinstein step down with dignity?

Retiring was an act of dignity for my Jewish grandfather. It could be for Feinstein, too.

I have been thinking about my grandfather this week for two reasons.

The first is that his yahrzeit, the anniversary of his death, is this Thursday. He passed away 13 years ago on Aug. 10 at the age of 86.

The second reason is that Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the oldest member of the Senate — already the subject of speculation regarding potential cognitive decline — was briefly hospitalized after a fall. She is 90 years old.

There have been many, increasingly loud calls for Feinstein to step down. This week’s news will surely encourage more. Some of Feinstein’s Senate colleagues have rebutted these calls by calling them sexist and ageist.

I consider the idea that it is sexist to question whether a 90-year-old who has missed months of work for health reasons should perhaps retire to be an insult to the very concept of feminism. But, even if I did not, that is outside the scope of this piece.

Both Feinstein and my grandfather were public servants. But my grandfather was able to take a path of dignity. When I think of him, one of the first things that comes to mind is that he was Hingham District Court’s first justice for 32 years. When he turned 70, in 1994, he had to retire, as judges in Massachusetts must do at that age.

My grandpa loved being a judge. I am sure no small part of him was sad — heartbroken, even — to retire. There was an element of it that felt unfair: Why did he have to retire when federal court judges never did?

“You shall rise before the aged and show deference to the old,” it says in Leviticus. And even if it did not, we should respect those who have spent more time on this Earth. It is often true that age brings wisdom and experience.

The author Emily Tamkin (center left) with her grandfather, father, and grandmother
The author (center left) with her grandfather, father, and grandmother Courtesy of Emily Tamkin

But it is also true, as we see often, that there is a time when it is harder for people to express that wisdom, and translate that experience in their public service. My grandpa stopped being a judge while he could still give it his all, and while he was still capable of serving in the way that he saw appropriate.

I don’t know if age 70 was too early, or if 75 or even 80 would have been more appropriate. But I do know that there was respect and dignity in that retirement. My grandpa got to stop doing something in which he took great pride while he still took pride in being able to do it.

I do not mean to compare being a Hingham Court District Judge to being a U.S. Senator (although we were all very proud of him). I am not advocating for a mandatory retirement age of 70. Nor am I telling Feinstein’s family how to feel.

But sometimes the most respectful thing we can do for those who have served us is to tell them that someone else should take a turn serving now.

In other words, we can respect our elders and be grateful for their service while also thinking that someone else should get to serve. These two things are not in tension: To want someone to finish their service while they are still fully capable of serving is to want them to finish their service at full capacity and with dignity.

There is nothing disrespectful about that: about wanting someone to finish their public service while they are still fully, capably, intentionally serving the public, and while the conversation is about that service, and not about their age or faculties.

I do not need to wonder what my grandpa would have said on this subject. When he passed away, the Patriot Ledger, a daily newspaper in Quincy, Massachusetts, reminded its readers, including the late judge’s granddaughter, of what the judge said before his retirement: “I’ve been here long enough. Once you start reminiscing about how the old days were better, you know it is time to leave.”

A message from our editor-in-chief Jodi Rudoren

We're building on 127 years of independent journalism to help you develop deeper connections to what it means to be Jewish today.

With so much at stake for the Jewish people right now — war, rising antisemitism, a high-stakes U.S. presidential election — American Jews depend on the Forward's perspective, integrity and courage.

—  Jodi Rudoren, Editor-in-Chief 

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.


Most Popular

In Case You Missed It

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.