Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Make a Passover gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW
News

A Get Law for Maryland?

What do you if you care about the fate of a “chained” woman, but your religious beliefs dictate that she can’t remarry until her estranged husband voluntarily signs a “get,” or bill of divorce?

For the ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America, the answer is simple: Lobby state lawmakers to require the recalcitrant Jewish husband to sign on the religious dotted line before being granted a civil divorce.

Agudath officials called a get law for Maryland a “high priority” in a press release sent out last week, and are pushing hard for its passage during the 2007 session. Baltimore Democrats Sandy Rosenberg and Lisa Gladden are expected to introduce a bill in the near future.

Get laws have only been on the communal agenda in the handful of states with large Orthodox populations, and New York is the only state actually to have one on the books. While the New York law has stood since 1983, it seems fairly clear to constitutional experts that it violates the First Amendment, due to entanglement issues.

In Maryland, lawmakers have rejected a get bill several times in recent years. This time, however, Agudath has taken care to bring along more liberal allies, including the local Jewish Federation.

As the Forward has covered repeatedly in our pages, the Orthodox have generally championed keeping government out of their religious affairs, as they have during the ongoing fracas over a highly controversial circumcision procedure. (Faith-based iniatives are one prominent exception to this rule.)

It is worth noting that, as proposed, the Maryland bill would not challenge the underlying assumption that it is the male who has final control over the end of a marriage: A woman who initiates civil divorce has no way of compelling her husband to sign a get.

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.