Coronavirus has made flaunting wealth taboo. What’s an influencer to do?
Some influencers garnered criticism for retreating to summer homes in the Hamptons for the duration of the pandemic. Image by iStock
By Irene Katz Connelly April 20, 2020
When Arielle Charnas developed symptoms of the novel coronavirus in mid-March, she found herself in the same boat as many New Yorkers: Sick, and scared.
What happened next was less common. While the city’s medical system was even then stretched thin and tests for the virus were — as they remain — hard to come by, within a few days Charnas had finagled her way into a test and learned it was positive. After several days of recovering in her four-bedroom apartment in Manhattan’s Flatiron district, she sought more spacious quarantine quarters, relocating, along with her husband, nanny, and two daughters, to a rental home in the Hamptons.
Many wealthy New Yorkers have, in recent months, done similarly. But Charnas is different: She’s an influencer accustomed to publicizing every detail of her life, and she documented every step of her coronavirus saga — from calling on a semi-famous doctor friend for help with testing to taking her first strolls in the Hamptons — for her 1.3 million Instagram followers. Each step of the way, fans could see exactly how her wealth mitigated the fear, uncertainty, and physical danger that have become the norm for many Americans in the era of coronavirus.
And they were not pleased.
Influencers accrue followings on social media platforms like Instagram by presenting curated, aspirational versions of their daily lives for public consumption. Many profess expertise in fields from skincare to motherhood, which they use to market products to their followers, often receiving lucrative sponsorships or free products from companies in exchange. But the coronavirus pandemic has made the practice of flaunting a certain amount of wealth, previously essential for influencers, newly verboten. And, at least in Charnas’ case, audiences who previously welcomed a steady diet of high-fashion mirror selfies have are now infuriated by the stark difference between their pandemic experiences and those of the wealthy.
Charnas initially ignored negative comments, continuing to post about the loungewear brands she favored while social distancing. But as disapproval mounted, she stopped posting for several days, before resurfacing with a lengthy Notes apology in which she expressed remorse for her actions, but also explained how she saw each of them as justified. More than anything else, the apology reflected Charnas’ genuine confusion at the backlash she was experiencing.
She’s not alone in that confusion. A spin through the Instagrams of several Jewish influencers reveals a variety of approaches to handling the new influencer normal, in which the old rulebook — convey authenticity while providing a window into a world that, for most people, doesn’t mirror any kind of authentic experience — has abruptly been thrown out. That change poses a fundamental threat to the influencer lifestyle: If they aren’t better attired, better organized and better connected than the rest of us, who will want to buy the stuff they’re selling?
Some have seriously toned down their online presence. Actress Jenny Mollen’s Instagram, normally a montage of snapshots from fancy dress events, has featured only a few photographs in the past weeks. Instead, her feed is filled with typed quips about the challenges of quarantining with kids, to which all — OK, some — parents can relate: “Remember when the biggest threat to our daily lives were non-organic strawberries?”
In contrast, fashion blogger and perennial gala attendee Elizabeth Savetsky’s Instagram is just as styled as ever. (Disclaimer: the Forward has previously interviewed Savetsky for our newsletter Our Time.) But in her captions, the influencer is opting for a more reflective, restrained tone. She’s posted about drawing inspiration from observing Shabbat HaGadol, the last Shabbat before Passover. She live-streamed a conversation with her rabbi on coping with coronavirus. And after he suggested that she and her family journal through this period, she posed with her daughter, pens in hand, in their spacious sunroom. (If that doesn’t seem particularly restrained, consider that one post from late February featured the Valentino-clad influencer reclining in a sports car.)
Meanwhile, parenting blogger Ilana Wiles, who in recent weeks had all the symptoms of coronavirus but was never tested, has offered a tutorial in chronicling a case of likely coronavirus without incurring backlash. Wiles, who runs the blog Mommy Shorts and whose social media presence has generally been more informative than overtly envy-producing, announced her family’s evacuation to their Long Island summer house in a blog post, forestalling criticism with a detailed explanation of their safety precautions and an acknowledgment of the privilege inherent in her decision. “We feel incredibly lucky to have the house as an option,” she said, stressing that it was isolated even from neighbors.
As she prepared to leave New York, Wiles also posted candidly about stalled brand partnerships and the virus’ toll on her own livelihood. As the economy slows, many brands are at least temporarily stepping back spending on sponsored content. While some influencers are independently wealthy, many depend upon that revenue to maintain their enviable lifestyles. “Financially, this is a scary time for me too. Not as scary as for some people, but still scary,” she wrote.
When Wiles developed coronavirus symptoms, shortly after decamping to Long Island, her doctor advised her to isolate from her family in her room, informing her she wasn’t a candidate for testing. With particular emphasis on her adherence to those instructions, she shared much of her ensuing experience on Instagram, posting reflections on the unenviable task of homeschooling a seven-year-old from behind a closed door. She marked the end of her quarantine with a funny TikTok in which she emerged from her bedroom, surveyed the mess that had accumulated in her absence, and retreated back to bed.
Her dispatches from quarantine remained as chic as her normal posts. Even in confinement, she maintained an impressive blowout; her children studied at small Scandanavian-style desks, and I had to watch the TikTok multiple times to get the joke because the “messy” living room looked, by my standards, fairly tidy. But by focusing on widespread features of the pandemic, from the unavailability of tests to the reality of confinement in a small space, she successfully characterized her experience as similar to that of her followers. “Thank you for the dose of ‘real,’” wrote one commenter.
Some have suggested that the coronavirus will permanently curb our collective appetite to participate vicariously in more privileged lives. It’s easier than ever for influencers to appear “detached or tone deaf,” Flora Tsapovsky wrote in Wired: photos of plush quarantine pads hint at a level of comfort and security impossible to approximate by buying a scented candle or a pair of shoes. And in a time of massive unemployment and financial uncertainty, it’s hard to argue that broadcasting that comfort constitutes a meaningful service to followers. In Vanity Fair, Kenzie Bryant argued that the current moment has exposed a longstanding truth about influencers: “Their world is not set up to serve anyone else.”
But while Charnas, whose Instagram apologies met with mingled skepticism and heart emojis in the comments section, will have to keep her head down for a few more weeks, and some influencers may be modulating their posts, others have shown that even in the era of coronavirus, it’s possible to proceed with business as usual.
Danielle Bernstein, founder of the fashion blog We Wore What, recently posted a photo of herself taking a work call in front of the Westhampton Beach home where she is waiting out the pandemic. It’s unlikely that many of her followers have modernist mansions at their disposal during this pandemic, or can afford the Chanel bag or designer eyewear she sported in the post. But, Bernstein noted in the caption, she was wearing trousers from the fast fashion retailer Zara. By buying them, followers could approximate her quarantine lifestyle — if only very loosely.
With over 20,000 likes, the post was a success. Commenters evinced admiration for Bernstein’s vacation house and interest in purchasing the one widely accessible item pictured. “Obsessed with this look and this house!” one commenter wrote.
“I need those pants from Zara,” another said.
Irene Katz Connelly is an editorial fellow at the Forward. You can contact her at [email protected].
A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.
If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
