Times Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Hoped for ‘Amicable’ Break-Up With Jill Abramson

Image by getty images
New York Times Co Chairman and Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. said he tried to part ways peacefully with the top leader of the newsroom, Jill Abramson, whom he ousted last week.
“We originally drafted the whole thing to be very amicable,” Sulzberger said in an interview with Vanity Fair, his first since he changed the leadership of his paper. “Jill said no.”
“It was my hope for Jill that we could make this go away as peacefully as possible.” (http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2014/05/arthur-sulzberger-interview-jill-abramson-firing)
The frenzy surrounding the story has been anything but quiet since Sulzberger replaced Abramson with her deputy, Dean Baquet, stunning the Times newsroom and close followers of the paper when it was announced last Wednesday.
The volley of accusations over Abramson’s firing has come hard and fast. The New Yorker reported that Abramson was paid considerably less than her male predecessor Bill Keller, a charge Sulzberger denies.
On Saturday, Sulzberger issued a staff memo saying he terminated Abramson for her “arbitrary decision-making, a failure to consult and bring colleagues with her, inadequate communication and the public mistreatment of colleagues.”
Abramson is the third hand-picked executive that Sulzberger has ousted including Times executive editor Howell Raines and the company’s chief executive Janet Robinson.
When asked about his decision-making process, Sulzberger told Vanity Fair: “Am I doing a bad job of picking leaders for The New York Times? I don’t think so. Everyone who pretends they have a 100 percent success rate isn’t trying hard enough.”
At an awards ceremony on Monday night in New York, hosted by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Sulzberger thanked Abramson for being one of the most “forceful voices” in challenging a secretive White House.
Earlier on Monday, Abramson spoke out for the first time during a commencement speech at Wake Forest telling graduates to keep fighting.
“Some of you, and now I’m talking to anybody who has been dumped … You know the sting of losing and not getting something you badly want. When that happens, show them what you are made of,” she said.
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news. All donations are still being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000 until April 24.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

