Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Make a Passover gift and support Jewish journalism. DONATE NOW
Fast Forward

UK Jews Slam Labour’s ‘Reward’ for Author of Anti-Semitism report

British Jews accused the head of the United Kingdom’s Labour party of rewarding the author of a “whitewashed” report about the party’s anti-Semitism problem by appointing her a lawmaker.

Shami Chakrabarti, a human rights activist and Labour member, was recommended by Labour for peerage – a term that means being appointed to the House of Lords — on Thursday, less than two months after she submitted a report asserting that, while there is “occasionally toxic atmosphere” against Jews in Labour, anti-Semitism is not prevalent in the party’s ranks. Peerage is ultimately given by the Royal House.

The report was written following dozens of anti-Israel statements by Labour lawmakers since Jeremy Corbyn, a radical left-wing lawmaker who called Hezbollah and Hamas his “friends” in 2009, was elected to head the party last year. He has since said he regrets calling these anti-Semitic terrorist groups his friends.

“It is beyond disappointing to see this,” Gillian Meron, a member of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, on the BBC Friday about Chakrabarti’s nomination. “It looks like a real question about the independence” of the report. “It looks like a reward of peerage for the delivery of a report which was something of a whitewash.”

In a highly unusual statement for his nonpartisan umbrella group, Board of Deputies President Jonathan Arkush said earlier this year that most Jews “can’t trust” Labour under Corbyn, whom Arkush accused of encouraging anti-Semitic vitriol with his anti-Israel rhetoric.

The peerage system, which contains elements brought over from when Britain was ruled by monarchs, is often criticized as undemocratic because it involves the appointment to the upper house of members who are not elected directly by the constituents, but who are instead appointed based on their perceived merits.

Advocates of the system argue it does not infringe on the democratic process, as the House of Lords has relatively truncated powers.

The Campaign Against Antisemitism, a British watchdog group, also condemned Chakrabarti’s nomination.

“If anybody still took Shami Chakrabarti’s report or Jeremy Corbyn’s declared opposition to antisemitism seriously, this must be the final straw,” Jonathan Sacerdoti, the organization’s spokesperson, said in a statement. “She did not tackle allegations of antisemitism in the Labour Party or their woeful handling by Jeremy Corbyn, and she even refused to adopt a definition of antisemitism. Having promised to never send anyone to the House of Lords, that is exactly what Jeremy Corbyn has done in return for a clean bill of health.”

A spokesperson for Corbyn’s office defended the nomination in an statement made to The Guardian:
“Shami Chakrabarti shares Jeremy’s ambition for reform of the House of Lords. Her career has been one of public service and human rights advocacy. Her legal and campaigning skills, and the trust that she has gained from many ordinary Britons, will be a considerable asset to the House of Lords.”

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:

  • Credit the Forward
  • Retain our pixel
  • Preserve our canonical link in Google search
  • Add a noindex tag in Google search

See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.