By Stewart Ain July 14, 2021

Courtesy of Tingey Injury Law Firm

The applicant, Faigy Rachel Weiss of Brooklyn, plausibly alleges that university officials violated her rights, wrote Judge Vernon S. Broderick of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in a July 2 ruling.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

Weiss, who is representing herself and could not be reached for comment, initially filed the lawsuit in 2017 after applying to the Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College, which is a part of New York City’s university system. The defendants asked that the case be dismissed.

But Broderick ruled that the case can go forward, and cited the alleged comments of John T. Rose, a Hunter College dean responsible for diversity issues. Weiss claims that Rose said that the school needed “to weed out conservatives because Trumps and Cruzes can’t be social workers” and that “Jews from religious backgrounds are too conservative to be social workers.” The lawsuit also names several other university officials as defendants, including Hunter College President Jennifer Raab.

A spokesperson for New York State Attorney General Letitia James, whose office is representing the defendants, referred requests for comment to the university. A university spokesperson, responding to an inquiry from the Forward, emailed: “We do not comment on pending litigation.”

Broderick in his ruling emphasized that his reference to Rose’s alleged comments should not be taken to mean that the court has found them to be true. But if they are, he continued, they “sufficiently demonstrate a racially discriminatory intent or purpose in the admissions process to support a claim” for a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.

The defendants — according to the judge’s ruling — argued that considering Weiss’s religion and religious upbringing in the admissions process does not mean her rights were violated, and that Weiss herself had disclosed her religious background in a personal statement to the school. And though the school holds that Weiss failed to demonstrate that the school rejected her for the reasons she claims, it also argued that the school has the right to consider any information applicants present to make their cases for admission.

But Broderick rejected that argument, quoting the First Amendment, which provides that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” A reasonable official would have known that disfavoring an applicant because she is Jewish would “fly in the face” of the Establishment Clause’s mandate that the government “must remain neutral toward religion,” he wrote.

Broderick required a response from the attorney general’s office within 21 days.

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

2X match on all Passover gifts!

$90 → $180 $180 → $360

$360 → $720

Other amount