Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
News

University Dispels Rumor Spread Online

Officials at the University of Kentucky are trying to dispel a myth circulating on the Internet that it has canceled its Holocaust-related classes due to pressure from Muslim students.

Last April, the online rumor-mill began churning when someone mistook the letters “UK,” signifying the United Kingdom, for the University of Kentucky and amended a chain letter to state that “the University of Kentucky removed the Holocaust from its school curriculum because it ‘offended’ the Muslim population which claims it never occurred.” The 27,000-student public university learned of the letter last spring when it began receiving irate e-mails and phone calls from concerned alumni and others.

Last month, in an attempt to set the record straight, leaders of the school went public with assurances that the information conveyed in the letter was false.

“The academic administration of the University of Kentucky would never permit such a grotesque lapse in its commitment to the principle of academic freedom,” Richard Greissman, the university’s assistant provost, said in a November 8 statement. “Let us bury this rumor.”

The University of Kentucky, where students can minor in Judaic studies, offers an intermediate-level history course on the Holocaust.

According to the investigative Web site Snopes.com, the rumor isn’t even true in reference to the United Kingdom. In its investigation, the Web site found that one history department at a school in Northern England did, in fact, cancel a Holocaust class, but this was an isolated incident.

A spokeswoman for the University of Kentucky, Allison Elliott, said that the 142-year-old institution received hundreds of inquiries from around the country. Last week, she said, the school received an angry letter from a doctor in New York. The university has been responding individually to each call or letter, Elliott said, but in recent weeks the volume of inquiries increased, leading the school to issue a robust rebuttal.

“Previously we felt it was just an Internet rumor and not worth the dignity of a response,” she said. “But we recently felt it necessary to reassure people it was just a rumor.”

A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.