Cheney’s Middle East Visit Draws Yawns
BYE, BYE: Vice President Cheney?s two-day visit to Israel was seen by some as little more than part of a farewell tour.
By Nathan Guttman March 27, 2008
Jerusalem – Vice President Dick Cheney traveled to Israel and the West Bank this past week, but in a sign of what some Middle East scholars are calling “peace process fatigue,” the visit drew scant attention from the Israeli press and resulted in barely any progress on the ground.
BYE, BYE: Vice President Cheney?s two-day visit to Israel was seen by some as little more than part of a farewell tour.
Cheney’s visit to Israel, part of a weeklong tour of the region, focused primarily on the Iranian nuclear threat, dealing only in general terms with the Bush administration’s push for an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement by the end of this year. With Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice traveling to the region on almost a monthly basis, and President Bush making his first visit to Jerusalem as head of state last January, Cheney’s trip was seen here as little more than a requisite stop in the series of farewell trips being made by top Bush administration officials.
“There will be no Oslo-style headlines,” an Israeli official said, referring to the dramatic atmosphere that surrounded the breakthrough 1993 agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. “There are talks going on behind the scenes, but we are not at a point when we can come out and say, ‘We have a deal.’”
During his two-day visit to Israel and the West Bank, Cheney stressed America’s commitment to Israel’s security and placed much of the blame for the lack of progress on the Palestinians.
“Terror and rockets do not merely kill innocent civilians; they also kill legitimate hopes and aspirations of the Palestinian people.” Cheney said during a March 23 visit to Ramallah. Peace, he added, will require “painful concessions” from both sides.
According to Israeli sources, the vice president, in meeting with Israeli leaders, did not make any specific demands of Jerusalem. But as the sources added, Israel nonetheless understands that living conditions in the West Bank must be eased for there to be movement within the peace process restarted this past October in Annapolis, Md.
Israel is reportedly considering the implementation of several measures in the coming weeks, during which time Rice is scheduled to visit the region again. Foremost among them are lifting several roadblocks in the West Bank to allow freer movement of people and goods, and transferring control of the northern West Bank city of Jenin to the Palestinian Authority. Jenin would become the second city, after Nablus, in which Israel cedes control of security to the P.A., although the Israeli military has retained the right to conduct operations in these cities.
An Israeli government source said the Palestinians should not expect a total lifting of all restrictions on movement within the West Bank, since serious terrorist threats still exist.
“We’ll do what we can, but this won’t answer all the Palestinian demands,” the official told the Forward.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
