Vice President Resorts to Brass Knuckle Tactics
Many moons ago, Vice President Dick Cheney held a meeting with his Energy Task Force to consider national policy in this vital area. Consumer and environmental groups complained that they had something to contribute to the discussion but had not been invited. The scuttlebutt was that energy corporations, like Enron, were present at the secret gathering.
Needless to say, this became a hot political issue in Congress, where the Democrats began to press hard to find out exactly with whom Cheney consulted in pursuing his policy. The overtones were sinister: A president who ran an oil company and a vice president who ran an oil company met with others to decide public policy; were these others also people who had run oil — or energy-related — companies?
The little joke going round said that we have nothing to worry about because the top posts were filled by people with different interests. Bush and Cheney came from different oil companies. But, to members of Congress, especially Democrats, the question of who met with Cheney to plan energy policy was no laughing matter. They wanted to know with whom he met. And their request was followed up by the General Accounting Office, a nonpartisan — or, better, bipartisan — arm of Congress charged with responsibility to get the facts the legislative branch of government needs to discharge its responsibilities.
The GAO asked Cheney with whom he had met. He advised the GAO that it was none of its business. Determined to discharge its responsibilities, the GAO decided to sue Cheney to get the information. The act made history: For the first time in the 80-year-old lifespan of the GAO, it sued another government entity. But, abruptly, the suit was withdrawn. And the why and the how are scary omens of how party and partisan power can be used to weaken and obliterate the revered doctrine of the separation of powers on which our Constitution is based. Here’s what happened according to The Hill, a Washington-based publication that specializes on the “inside dope” at the Capitol:
All of which raises two crucial questions. First, if the same party controls the White House and the Congress, how can the legislative branch be a separate, independent and counterbalancing power if the party in the White House uses its clout in the legislature to cut off funds if the arm of the legislature seeks to get vital information?
The only recourse for a determined GAO would be to bring the matter before the Supreme Court. But, as matters presently stand, the high court that put the president in office is unlikely to override the desire of the White House to conduct its affairs without a GAO snooping.
The second big question is even more bothersome: Just what is Cheney and the White House hiding that they go to such brazen brass-knuckled ends to conceal the names of those with whom they met?
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
