J.J. Goldberg, in the course of his incisive (and entertaining) column on the New York Jewish Community Relations Council’s annual congressional breakfast (“Bagels and Iran: The Congressional Breakfast,” February 3), feels obliged to parse for the perplexed the difference between public-affairs groups like the JCRC and fund-raising-and-allocations bodies such as the UJA-Federation: The Federation is Park Avenue liberal and Armani; the JCRC is middle-class, polyester, and black yarmulke.

Cute — but Goldberg misses the point. The difference between JCRCs and federations obviously has everything to do with role and mission: The federation system is all about coordination of fund-raising for social services, allocations and social planning; JCRCs coordinate public policy and inter-group relations on the local level.

But there’s more.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

This division of labor derives from an agreement hammered out in 1944 that in effect created the discrete sphere of Jewish community relations. The dilemma in recent years, and resultant confusion, arises from the fact that the federations, in disregard of the hoary 1944 contract, have gone into the public-policy arena big-time. Israel, anti-Semitism, international affairs, heretofore the province of community-relations agencies national and local, have been “hijacked” by the federations. These are “cash-cow” areas for fundraising.

It’s all about the money.

Jerome A. Chanes
New York, N.Y.

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

The coming year promises to be filled with more complex and historic developments. We are entering an era where independent, fact-based Jewish journalism will be more important than ever. We need to be ready for whatever 2025 will bring, and with your help, we can be.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

$36 $500

$120 $180 Other amount