Hasidic Discrimination Suit Against Bloomingburg Clears Legal Hurdle
Unwelcome: Orthodox developer Shalom Lamm owns properties in the upstate New York village of Bloomingburg. Image by MARTYNA STAROSTA
A federal judge ordered two New York municipalities in the Catskills foothills to face a lawsuit accusing them of discriminating against Hasidic Jews by trying to stop them from moving in.
U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest said Bloomingburg, a village in Sullivan County with about 400 residents, must face claims by the developer of a 396-unit townhouse complex that it violated federal civil rights and fair housing laws by trying to stop the project, which has been marketed in English- and Yiddish-language newspapers.
The Manhattan judge also said Mamakating, a town of 12,000 of which Bloomingburg is a part, must face claims it improperly blocked the conversion of a property into a mikvah, a bath used by Hasidic Jews for ritual immersion and purification.
Forrest also ordered local officials in both municipalities to face various claims.
The lawsuit portrays an effort by “political allies” and the municipalities they control “to engage in a pervasive and wide-ranging scheme to keep Hasidic Jews out of Bloomingburg,” the judge wrote in a 56-page decision.
Forrest dismissed claims alleging discriminatory building code enforcement, saying the plaintiffs lacked standing because they did not show injuries, and over a blocked construction of a Hasidic school.
The lawsuit sought $25 million, plus other remedies.
Some Hasidic families have moved north of New York City, including to the Kiryas Joel village in Monroe, as tight housing supply pushes home prices higher in the Brooklyn, New York neighborhoods where they have long had a presence.
Steven Engel, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said: “We’re pleased that the court sustained our claims against the town and village, and we look forward to our day in court.”
Various defendants argued that the lawsuit tried to transform their “legitimate governmental actions” into “acts of religious animus.” Individual government officials also said they were entitled to immunity for their decision-making.
In a statement, Bloomingburg Mayor Frank Girardi said the village “will continue to treat all residents evenhandedly,” including on building code issues. The village’s lawyers said they expect their clients to prevail on the surviving claims.
Brian Sokoloff, a lawyer for Mamakating, in an email called the remaining case against the town “a run-of-the-mill zoning dispute,” and said his clients “look forward to complete vindication.”
A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.
If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
